From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:42064) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bylYZ-0004Cy-PG for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 24 Oct 2016 16:09:16 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bylYZ-0001DU-1t for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 24 Oct 2016 16:09:15 -0400 Message-ID: <1477339711.2430.38.camel@kernel.crashing.org> From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2016 15:08:31 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20161024010055.GC19629@umbus.fritz.box> References: <7e2d79de-5e4b-6140-63e1-f6829d834b4a@ilande.co.uk> <1477087365.2430.3.camel@kernel.crashing.org> <20161024010055.GC19629@umbus.fritz.box> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] target-ppc: gdbstub breakpoints get stuck in an infinite loop on next/continue List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: David Gibson , Mark Cave-Ayland Cc: qemu-devel , "qemu-ppc@nongnu.org" On Mon, 2016-10-24 at 12:00 +1100, David Gibson wrote: > Ben, does it look like the other extraneous changes in bd6fefe are at > least correct, apart from being in the wrong patch? It looks like part of my big rewrite of the=C2=A0exception stuff, so I'd assume it's mostly correct minus a few bugs I fixed separately such as the one we are just talking about :-) Cheers, Ben.