From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:60454)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <kraxel@redhat.com>) id 1c6auK-0002hC-WF
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 15 Nov 2016 05:24:05 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <kraxel@redhat.com>) id 1c6auG-0007w2-1Y
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 15 Nov 2016 05:24:04 -0500
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:33958)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32)
	(Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <kraxel@redhat.com>) id 1c6auF-0007vA-S0
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 15 Nov 2016 05:23:59 -0500
Message-ID: <1479205433.32639.21.camel@redhat.com>
From: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2016 11:23:53 +0100
In-Reply-To: <20161114224401-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org>
References: <1478877672-73759-1-git-send-email-imammedo@redhat.com>
	<20161114224401-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Mime-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH for-2.8 0/2] pc: remove redundant fw_cfg
 file "etc/boot-cpus"
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Cc: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com>, Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@gmail.com>, Kevin
	O'Connor <kevin@koconnor.net>, Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>

  Hi,

> I agree we shouldn't commit to a bad host/guest API
> but I think we need to format it differently.
> First revert the boot-cpus patch for 2.8.
> On top of that, add a patch fixing FW_CFG_NB_CPUS.

Agree, doing a plain revert of 080ac219cc7d9c55adf925c3545b7450055ad625
is better.

cheers,
  Gerd