From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:50244) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1c9SZq-0005Lx-Dv for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 23 Nov 2016 03:06:47 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1c9SZm-0008Ok-3Z for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 23 Nov 2016 03:06:46 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:60164) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1c9SZl-0008N1-TV for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 23 Nov 2016 03:06:42 -0500 Message-ID: <1479888396.16465.5.camel@redhat.com> From: Gerd Hoffmann Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2016 09:06:36 +0100 In-Reply-To: References: <1479808693-30234-1-git-send-email-kraxel@redhat.com> <99e2e550-dad4-335f-e2d7-8a286863f57c@redhat.com> <8871cadb-3edf-5a3f-2da5-8981c12b79a0@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Mime-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] drm: update MAINTAINERS for qemu drivers (bochs, cirrus, qxl, virtio-gpu) List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Eric Blake Cc: Paolo Bonzini , Thomas Huth , David Airlie , dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, open list Hi, > >>>>>> +L: qemu-devel@nongnu.org > >>>> > >>>> qemu-devel list already has very high traffic - not sure whether it > >>>> makes much sense to route even more additional patches here. Maybe > >>>> rather create a separate mailing list like qemu-graphics@nongnu.org = ? > So you've just managed to convince me that including qemu-devel on every > driver patch, when qemu.git will not be modified, may indeed be > overkill; when compared to the option of just creating a new dedicated > list for the subset of kernel patches related to qemu drivers. Well, that isn't my intention. I want the kernel patches for qemu graphics being more visible for developers working on the host (device emulation) side. A separate list just for those patches is quite the contrary ... Maybe virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org would be a better choice than qemu-devel ... cheers, Gerd