From: Dou Liyang <douly.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
To: stefanha@redhat.com, kwolf@redhat.com, armbru@redhat.com,
mreitz@redhat.com, eblake@redhat.com, famz@redhat.com,
danpb@redhat.com
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, izumi.taku@jp.fujitsu.com,
caoj.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com, fanc.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com,
Dou Liyang <douly.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Subject: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 1/2] block/qapi: reduce the coupling between the bdrv_query_stats and bdrv_query_bds_stats
Date: Sun, 15 Jan 2017 16:01:14 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1484467275-27919-2-git-send-email-douly.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1484467275-27919-1-git-send-email-douly.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
The bdrv_query_stats and bdrv_query_bds_stats functions need to call
each other, that increases the coupling. it also makes the program
complicated and makes some unnecessary tests.
Remove the call from bdrv_query_bds_stats to bdrv_query_stats, just
take some recursion to make it clearly.
Avoid testing whether the blk is NULL during querying the bds stats.
It is unnecessary.
Signed-off-by: Dou Liyang <douly.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
---
block/qapi.c | 26 ++++++++++++++------------
1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/block/qapi.c b/block/qapi.c
index a62e862..bc622cd 100644
--- a/block/qapi.c
+++ b/block/qapi.c
@@ -357,10 +357,6 @@ static void bdrv_query_info(BlockBackend *blk, BlockInfo **p_info,
qapi_free_BlockInfo(info);
}
-static BlockStats *bdrv_query_stats(BlockBackend *blk,
- const BlockDriverState *bs,
- bool query_backing);
-
static void bdrv_query_blk_stats(BlockDeviceStats *ds, BlockBackend *blk)
{
BlockAcctStats *stats = blk_get_stats(blk);
@@ -428,9 +424,18 @@ static void bdrv_query_blk_stats(BlockDeviceStats *ds, BlockBackend *blk)
}
}
-static void bdrv_query_bds_stats(BlockStats *s, const BlockDriverState *bs,
+static BlockStats *bdrv_query_bds_stats(const BlockDriverState *bs,
bool query_backing)
{
+ BlockStats *s = NULL;
+
+ s = g_malloc0(sizeof(*s));
+ s->stats = g_malloc0(sizeof(*s->stats));
+
+ if (!bs) {
+ return s;
+ }
+
if (bdrv_get_node_name(bs)[0]) {
s->has_node_name = true;
s->node_name = g_strdup(bdrv_get_node_name(bs));
@@ -440,14 +445,15 @@ static void bdrv_query_bds_stats(BlockStats *s, const BlockDriverState *bs,
if (bs->file) {
s->has_parent = true;
- s->parent = bdrv_query_stats(NULL, bs->file->bs, query_backing);
+ s->parent = bdrv_query_bds_stats(bs->file->bs, query_backing);
}
if (query_backing && bs->backing) {
s->has_backing = true;
- s->backing = bdrv_query_stats(NULL, bs->backing->bs, query_backing);
+ s->backing = bdrv_query_bds_stats(bs->backing->bs, query_backing);
}
+ return s;
}
static BlockStats *bdrv_query_stats(BlockBackend *blk,
@@ -456,17 +462,13 @@ static BlockStats *bdrv_query_stats(BlockBackend *blk,
{
BlockStats *s;
- s = g_malloc0(sizeof(*s));
- s->stats = g_malloc0(sizeof(*s->stats));
+ s = bdrv_query_bds_stats(bs, query_backing);
if (blk) {
s->has_device = true;
s->device = g_strdup(blk_name(blk));
bdrv_query_blk_stats(s->stats, blk);
}
- if (bs) {
- bdrv_query_bds_stats(s, bs, query_backing);
- }
return s;
}
--
2.5.5
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-01-15 8:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-01-15 8:01 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 0/2] block/qapi: refactor and optimize the qmp_query_blockstats() Dou Liyang
2017-01-15 8:01 ` Dou Liyang [this message]
2017-01-15 8:01 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 2/2] block/qapi: reduce the execution time of qmp_query_blockstats Dou Liyang
2017-02-01 3:02 ` Max Reitz
2017-02-01 3:19 ` Dou Liyang
2017-01-23 5:31 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 0/2] block/qapi: refactor and optimize the qmp_query_blockstats() Dou Liyang
2017-01-23 13:13 ` Markus Armbruster
2017-02-01 3:06 ` Max Reitz
2017-02-01 6:55 ` Markus Armbruster
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1484467275-27919-2-git-send-email-douly.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com \
--to=douly.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=armbru@redhat.com \
--cc=caoj.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=danpb@redhat.com \
--cc=eblake@redhat.com \
--cc=famz@redhat.com \
--cc=fanc.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=izumi.taku@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
--cc=mreitz@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).