From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:49877) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cWfFe-0008Qn-J8 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 26 Jan 2017 03:17:51 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cWfFa-0007EA-KV for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 26 Jan 2017 03:17:50 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:51990) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cWfFa-0007Du-Eg for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 26 Jan 2017 03:17:46 -0500 Message-ID: <1485418662.17048.18.camel@redhat.com> From: Gerd Hoffmann Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2017 09:17:42 +0100 In-Reply-To: References: <1485365075-32702-1-git-send-email-phil@philjordan.eu> <148536527026.27.12814124354919992023@eba24e3a0d7f> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Mime-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3] hw/usb/dev-hid: Improve guest compatibility of usb-tablet List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Phil Dennis-Jordan Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, famz@redhat.com, "Gabriel L. Somlo" On Mi, 2017-01-25 at 18:36 +0100, Phil Dennis-Jordan wrote: > On 25 January 2017 at 18:27, wrote: > > Your series seems to have some coding style problems. See output below = for > > more information: > > > > Type: series > > Subject: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3] hw/usb/dev-hid: Improve guest compatib= ility of usb-tablet > > Message-id: 1485365075-32702-1-git-send-email-phil@philjordan.eu > > > > =3D=3D=3D OUTPUT BEGIN =3D=3D=3D > > Checking PATCH 1/1: hw/usb/dev-hid: Improve guest compatibility of usb-= tablet... > > ERROR: code indent should never use tabs > > #43: FILE: hw/usb/dev-hid.c:490: > > + 0x09, 0x02,^I^I/* Usage (Mouse) */$ >=20 > Interestingly, the surrounding array initialisation already uses tabs, > so replacing them with spaces on only the line I edited seems wrong as > it'll mis-render in editors configured with a different tab width. > Please let me know if I need to take action on this issue, and if so > what to do. (I can add a whitespace-only patch to fix the surrounding > area, for example. Coding guidelines suggest this might not be > desirable though.) I'll happily take the patch as-is. thanks, Gerd