From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:55361) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cdePB-0007uR-79 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 14 Feb 2017 09:48:34 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cdeP8-0001CY-4P for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 14 Feb 2017 09:48:33 -0500 Received: from mailhub.sw.ru ([195.214.232.25]:12556 helo=relay.sw.ru) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cdeP7-0001Ba-PS for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 14 Feb 2017 09:48:30 -0500 From: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2017 17:48:24 +0300 Message-Id: <1487083704-51658-1-git-send-email-vsementsov@virtuozzo.com> Subject: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] backup: allow target without .bdrv_get_info List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-block@nongnu.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org Cc: mreitz@redhat.com, kwolf@redhat.com, jcody@redhat.com, jsnow@redhat.com, famz@redhat.com, den@openvz.org, vsementsov@virtuozzo.com, stefanha@redhat.com Currently backup to nbd target is broken, as nbd doesn't have .bdrv_get_info realization. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy --- Hi all! Since commit commit 4c9bca7e39a6e07ad02c1dcde3478363344ec60b Author: John Snow Date: Thu Feb 25 15:58:30 2016 -0500 block/backup: avoid copying less than full target clusters backup to nbd target is broken, we have "Couldn't determine the cluster size of the target image". Proposed NBD protocol extension - NBD_OPT_INFO should finally solve this problem. But until it is not realized, we need allow backup to nbd target due to backward compatibility. Furthermore, is it entirely ok to disallow backup if bds lacks .bdrv_get_info? Which behavior should be default: to fail backup or to use default cluster size? block/backup.c | 5 ++++- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/block/backup.c b/block/backup.c index ea38733..095a390 100644 --- a/block/backup.c +++ b/block/backup.c @@ -638,7 +638,10 @@ BlockJob *backup_job_create(const char *job_id, BlockDriverState *bs, * backup cluster size is smaller than the target cluster size. Even for * targets with a backing file, try to avoid COW if possible. */ ret = bdrv_get_info(target, &bdi); - if (ret < 0 && !target->backing) { + if (ret == -ENOTSUP) { + /* Cluster size is not defined */ + job->cluster_size = BACKUP_CLUSTER_SIZE_DEFAULT; + } else if (ret < 0 && !target->backing) { error_setg_errno(errp, -ret, "Couldn't determine the cluster size of the target image, " "which has no backing file"); -- 1.8.3.1