* [Qemu-devel] [PATCH V2 0/3] COLO-compare: Optimize the code and fix some bug
@ 2017-02-28 5:18 Zhang Chen
2017-02-28 5:18 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH V2 1/3] COLO-compare: Rename compare function and remove duplicate codes Zhang Chen
` (2 more replies)
0 siblings, 3 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Zhang Chen @ 2017-02-28 5:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: qemu devel, Jason Wang
Cc: Zhang Chen, zhanghailiang, eddie . dong, bian naimeng, Li Zhijian
This series we will Optimize the code and fix some bug.
Patch1: Rename colo_packet_compare() and remove duplicate check in compare icmp.
Patch2: Optimize compare_common and increase compare performance.
Patch3: Fix debug info always print bug.
Zhang Chen (3):
COLO-compare: Rename compare function and remove duplicate codes
COLO-compare: Optimize compare_common and compare_tcp
COLO-compare: Fix icmp and udp compare different packet always dump
bug
net/colo-compare.c | 66 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------
1 file changed, 41 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
--
2.7.4
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [Qemu-devel] [PATCH V2 1/3] COLO-compare: Rename compare function and remove duplicate codes
2017-02-28 5:18 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH V2 0/3] COLO-compare: Optimize the code and fix some bug Zhang Chen
@ 2017-02-28 5:18 ` Zhang Chen
2017-02-28 5:18 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH V2 2/3] COLO-compare: Optimize compare_common and compare_tcp Zhang Chen
2017-02-28 5:18 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH V2 3/3] COLO-compare: Fix icmp and udp compare different packet always dump bug Zhang Chen
2 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Zhang Chen @ 2017-02-28 5:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: qemu devel, Jason Wang
Cc: Zhang Chen, zhanghailiang, eddie . dong, bian naimeng, Li Zhijian
Rename colo_packet_compare() to colo_packet_compare_common() that
make tcp_compare udp_compare icmp_compare reuse this function.
Remove minimum packet size check in icmp_compare, because we have
check this in parse_packet_early().
Signed-off-by: Zhang Chen <zhangchen.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
---
net/colo-compare.c | 18 +++++++-----------
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/colo-compare.c b/net/colo-compare.c
index 300f017..602a758 100644
--- a/net/colo-compare.c
+++ b/net/colo-compare.c
@@ -180,7 +180,7 @@ static int packet_enqueue(CompareState *s, int mode)
* return: 0 means packet same
* > 0 || < 0 means packet different
*/
-static int colo_packet_compare(Packet *ppkt, Packet *spkt)
+static int colo_packet_compare_common(Packet *ppkt, Packet *spkt)
{
trace_colo_compare_ip_info(ppkt->size, inet_ntoa(ppkt->ip->ip_src),
inet_ntoa(ppkt->ip->ip_dst), spkt->size,
@@ -190,6 +190,7 @@ static int colo_packet_compare(Packet *ppkt, Packet *spkt)
if (ppkt->size == spkt->size) {
return memcmp(ppkt->data, spkt->data, spkt->size);
} else {
+ trace_colo_compare_main("Net packet size are not the same");
return -1;
}
}
@@ -205,6 +206,7 @@ static int colo_packet_compare_tcp(Packet *spkt, Packet *ppkt)
int res;
trace_colo_compare_main("compare tcp");
+
if (ppkt->size != spkt->size) {
if (trace_event_get_state(TRACE_COLO_COMPARE_MISCOMPARE)) {
trace_colo_compare_main("pkt size not same");
@@ -263,7 +265,8 @@ static int colo_packet_compare_udp(Packet *spkt, Packet *ppkt)
int ret;
trace_colo_compare_main("compare udp");
- ret = colo_packet_compare(ppkt, spkt);
+
+ ret = colo_packet_compare_common(ppkt, spkt);
if (ret) {
trace_colo_compare_udp_miscompare("primary pkt size", ppkt->size);
@@ -281,16 +284,9 @@ static int colo_packet_compare_udp(Packet *spkt, Packet *ppkt)
*/
static int colo_packet_compare_icmp(Packet *spkt, Packet *ppkt)
{
- int network_length;
-
trace_colo_compare_main("compare icmp");
- network_length = ppkt->ip->ip_hl * 4;
- if (ppkt->size != spkt->size ||
- ppkt->size < network_length + ETH_HLEN) {
- return -1;
- }
- if (colo_packet_compare(ppkt, spkt)) {
+ if (colo_packet_compare_common(ppkt, spkt)) {
trace_colo_compare_icmp_miscompare("primary pkt size",
ppkt->size);
qemu_hexdump((char *)ppkt->data, stderr, "colo-compare",
@@ -316,7 +312,7 @@ static int colo_packet_compare_other(Packet *spkt, Packet *ppkt)
inet_ntoa(ppkt->ip->ip_dst), spkt->size,
inet_ntoa(spkt->ip->ip_src),
inet_ntoa(spkt->ip->ip_dst));
- return colo_packet_compare(ppkt, spkt);
+ return colo_packet_compare_common(ppkt, spkt);
}
static int colo_old_packet_check_one(Packet *pkt, int64_t *check_time)
--
2.7.4
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [Qemu-devel] [PATCH V2 2/3] COLO-compare: Optimize compare_common and compare_tcp
2017-02-28 5:18 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH V2 0/3] COLO-compare: Optimize the code and fix some bug Zhang Chen
2017-02-28 5:18 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH V2 1/3] COLO-compare: Rename compare function and remove duplicate codes Zhang Chen
@ 2017-02-28 5:18 ` Zhang Chen
2017-02-28 5:47 ` Jason Wang
2017-02-28 5:18 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH V2 3/3] COLO-compare: Fix icmp and udp compare different packet always dump bug Zhang Chen
2 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Zhang Chen @ 2017-02-28 5:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: qemu devel, Jason Wang
Cc: Zhang Chen, zhanghailiang, eddie . dong, bian naimeng, Li Zhijian
Add offset args for colo_packet_compare_common, optimize
colo_packet_compare_icmp() and colo_packet_compare_udp()
just compare the IP payload. Before compare all tcp packet,
we compare tcp checksum firstly, this function can get
better performance.
Signed-off-by: Zhang Chen <zhangchen.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
---
net/colo-compare.c | 42 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/colo-compare.c b/net/colo-compare.c
index 602a758..61fcdf2 100644
--- a/net/colo-compare.c
+++ b/net/colo-compare.c
@@ -180,7 +180,7 @@ static int packet_enqueue(CompareState *s, int mode)
* return: 0 means packet same
* > 0 || < 0 means packet different
*/
-static int colo_packet_compare_common(Packet *ppkt, Packet *spkt)
+static int colo_packet_compare_common(Packet *ppkt, Packet *spkt, int offset)
{
trace_colo_compare_ip_info(ppkt->size, inet_ntoa(ppkt->ip->ip_src),
inet_ntoa(ppkt->ip->ip_dst), spkt->size,
@@ -188,7 +188,8 @@ static int colo_packet_compare_common(Packet *ppkt, Packet *spkt)
inet_ntoa(spkt->ip->ip_dst));
if (ppkt->size == spkt->size) {
- return memcmp(ppkt->data, spkt->data, spkt->size);
+ return memcmp(ppkt->data + offset, spkt->data + offset,
+ spkt->size - offset);
} else {
trace_colo_compare_main("Net packet size are not the same");
return -1;
@@ -207,13 +208,6 @@ static int colo_packet_compare_tcp(Packet *spkt, Packet *ppkt)
trace_colo_compare_main("compare tcp");
- if (ppkt->size != spkt->size) {
- if (trace_event_get_state(TRACE_COLO_COMPARE_MISCOMPARE)) {
- trace_colo_compare_main("pkt size not same");
- }
- return -1;
- }
-
ptcp = (struct tcphdr *)ppkt->transport_header;
stcp = (struct tcphdr *)spkt->transport_header;
@@ -231,8 +225,11 @@ static int colo_packet_compare_tcp(Packet *spkt, Packet *ppkt)
spkt->ip->ip_sum = ppkt->ip->ip_sum;
}
- res = memcmp(ppkt->data + ETH_HLEN, spkt->data + ETH_HLEN,
- (spkt->size - ETH_HLEN));
+ if (ptcp->th_sum == stcp->th_sum) {
+ res = colo_packet_compare_common(ppkt, spkt, ETH_HLEN);
+ } else {
+ res = -1;
+ }
if (res != 0 && trace_event_get_state(TRACE_COLO_COMPARE_MISCOMPARE)) {
trace_colo_compare_pkt_info_src(inet_ntoa(ppkt->ip->ip_src),
@@ -263,10 +260,18 @@ static int colo_packet_compare_tcp(Packet *spkt, Packet *ppkt)
static int colo_packet_compare_udp(Packet *spkt, Packet *ppkt)
{
int ret;
+ int network_length = ppkt->ip->ip_hl * 4;
trace_colo_compare_main("compare udp");
- ret = colo_packet_compare_common(ppkt, spkt);
+ /*
+ * Because of ppkt and spkt are both in the same connection,
+ * The ppkt's src ip, dst ip, src port, dst port, ip_proto all are
+ * same with spkt. In addition, IP header's Identification is a random
+ * field, we can handle it in IP fragmentation function later.
+ * So we just compare the ip payload here.
+ */
+ ret = colo_packet_compare_common(ppkt, spkt, network_length + ETH_HLEN);
if (ret) {
trace_colo_compare_udp_miscompare("primary pkt size", ppkt->size);
@@ -284,9 +289,18 @@ static int colo_packet_compare_udp(Packet *spkt, Packet *ppkt)
*/
static int colo_packet_compare_icmp(Packet *spkt, Packet *ppkt)
{
+ int network_length = ppkt->ip->ip_hl * 4;
+
trace_colo_compare_main("compare icmp");
- if (colo_packet_compare_common(ppkt, spkt)) {
+ /*
+ * Because of ppkt and spkt are both in the same connection,
+ * The ppkt's src ip, dst ip, src port, dst port, ip_proto all are
+ * same with spkt. In addition, IP header's Identification is a random
+ * field, we can handle it in IP fragmentation function later.
+ * So we just compare the ip payload here.
+ */
+ if (colo_packet_compare_common(ppkt, spkt, network_length + ETH_HLEN)) {
trace_colo_compare_icmp_miscompare("primary pkt size",
ppkt->size);
qemu_hexdump((char *)ppkt->data, stderr, "colo-compare",
@@ -312,7 +326,7 @@ static int colo_packet_compare_other(Packet *spkt, Packet *ppkt)
inet_ntoa(ppkt->ip->ip_dst), spkt->size,
inet_ntoa(spkt->ip->ip_src),
inet_ntoa(spkt->ip->ip_dst));
- return colo_packet_compare_common(ppkt, spkt);
+ return colo_packet_compare_common(ppkt, spkt, 0);
}
static int colo_old_packet_check_one(Packet *pkt, int64_t *check_time)
--
2.7.4
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [Qemu-devel] [PATCH V2 3/3] COLO-compare: Fix icmp and udp compare different packet always dump bug
2017-02-28 5:18 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH V2 0/3] COLO-compare: Optimize the code and fix some bug Zhang Chen
2017-02-28 5:18 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH V2 1/3] COLO-compare: Rename compare function and remove duplicate codes Zhang Chen
2017-02-28 5:18 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH V2 2/3] COLO-compare: Optimize compare_common and compare_tcp Zhang Chen
@ 2017-02-28 5:18 ` Zhang Chen
2 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Zhang Chen @ 2017-02-28 5:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: qemu devel, Jason Wang
Cc: Zhang Chen, zhanghailiang, eddie . dong, bian naimeng, Li Zhijian
Signed-off-by: Zhang Chen <zhangchen.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
---
net/colo-compare.c | 18 ++++++++++++------
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/colo-compare.c b/net/colo-compare.c
index 61fcdf2..6b38723 100644
--- a/net/colo-compare.c
+++ b/net/colo-compare.c
@@ -275,9 +275,13 @@ static int colo_packet_compare_udp(Packet *spkt, Packet *ppkt)
if (ret) {
trace_colo_compare_udp_miscompare("primary pkt size", ppkt->size);
- qemu_hexdump((char *)ppkt->data, stderr, "colo-compare", ppkt->size);
trace_colo_compare_udp_miscompare("Secondary pkt size", spkt->size);
- qemu_hexdump((char *)spkt->data, stderr, "colo-compare", spkt->size);
+ if (trace_event_get_state(TRACE_COLO_COMPARE_MISCOMPARE)) {
+ qemu_hexdump((char *)ppkt->data, stderr, "colo-compare pri pkt",
+ ppkt->size);
+ qemu_hexdump((char *)spkt->data, stderr, "colo-compare sec pkt",
+ spkt->size);
+ }
}
return ret;
@@ -303,12 +307,14 @@ static int colo_packet_compare_icmp(Packet *spkt, Packet *ppkt)
if (colo_packet_compare_common(ppkt, spkt, network_length + ETH_HLEN)) {
trace_colo_compare_icmp_miscompare("primary pkt size",
ppkt->size);
- qemu_hexdump((char *)ppkt->data, stderr, "colo-compare",
- ppkt->size);
trace_colo_compare_icmp_miscompare("Secondary pkt size",
spkt->size);
- qemu_hexdump((char *)spkt->data, stderr, "colo-compare",
- spkt->size);
+ if (trace_event_get_state(TRACE_COLO_COMPARE_MISCOMPARE)) {
+ qemu_hexdump((char *)ppkt->data, stderr, "colo-compare pri pkt",
+ ppkt->size);
+ qemu_hexdump((char *)spkt->data, stderr, "colo-compare sec pkt",
+ spkt->size);
+ }
return -1;
} else {
return 0;
--
2.7.4
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH V2 2/3] COLO-compare: Optimize compare_common and compare_tcp
2017-02-28 5:18 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH V2 2/3] COLO-compare: Optimize compare_common and compare_tcp Zhang Chen
@ 2017-02-28 5:47 ` Jason Wang
2017-02-28 6:11 ` Zhang Chen
0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Jason Wang @ 2017-02-28 5:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Zhang Chen, qemu devel
Cc: zhanghailiang, eddie . dong, bian naimeng, Li Zhijian
On 2017年02月28日 13:18, Zhang Chen wrote:
> Add offset args for colo_packet_compare_common, optimize
> colo_packet_compare_icmp() and colo_packet_compare_udp()
> just compare the IP payload. Before compare all tcp packet,
> we compare tcp checksum firstly, this function can get
> better performance.
>
> Signed-off-by: Zhang Chen <zhangchen.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
> ---
> net/colo-compare.c | 42 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
> 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/colo-compare.c b/net/colo-compare.c
> index 602a758..61fcdf2 100644
> --- a/net/colo-compare.c
> +++ b/net/colo-compare.c
> @@ -180,7 +180,7 @@ static int packet_enqueue(CompareState *s, int mode)
> * return: 0 means packet same
> * > 0 || < 0 means packet different
> */
> -static int colo_packet_compare_common(Packet *ppkt, Packet *spkt)
> +static int colo_packet_compare_common(Packet *ppkt, Packet *spkt, int offset)
> {
> trace_colo_compare_ip_info(ppkt->size, inet_ntoa(ppkt->ip->ip_src),
> inet_ntoa(ppkt->ip->ip_dst), spkt->size,
> @@ -188,7 +188,8 @@ static int colo_packet_compare_common(Packet *ppkt, Packet *spkt)
> inet_ntoa(spkt->ip->ip_dst));
>
> if (ppkt->size == spkt->size) {
> - return memcmp(ppkt->data, spkt->data, spkt->size);
> + return memcmp(ppkt->data + offset, spkt->data + offset,
> + spkt->size - offset);
> } else {
> trace_colo_compare_main("Net packet size are not the same");
> return -1;
> @@ -207,13 +208,6 @@ static int colo_packet_compare_tcp(Packet *spkt, Packet *ppkt)
>
> trace_colo_compare_main("compare tcp");
>
> - if (ppkt->size != spkt->size) {
> - if (trace_event_get_state(TRACE_COLO_COMPARE_MISCOMPARE)) {
> - trace_colo_compare_main("pkt size not same");
> - }
> - return -1;
> - }
> -
> ptcp = (struct tcphdr *)ppkt->transport_header;
> stcp = (struct tcphdr *)spkt->transport_header;
>
> @@ -231,8 +225,11 @@ static int colo_packet_compare_tcp(Packet *spkt, Packet *ppkt)
> spkt->ip->ip_sum = ppkt->ip->ip_sum;
> }
>
> - res = memcmp(ppkt->data + ETH_HLEN, spkt->data + ETH_HLEN,
> - (spkt->size - ETH_HLEN));
> + if (ptcp->th_sum == stcp->th_sum) {
> + res = colo_packet_compare_common(ppkt, spkt, ETH_HLEN);
> + } else {
> + res = -1;
> + }
>
> if (res != 0 && trace_event_get_state(TRACE_COLO_COMPARE_MISCOMPARE)) {
> trace_colo_compare_pkt_info_src(inet_ntoa(ppkt->ip->ip_src),
> @@ -263,10 +260,18 @@ static int colo_packet_compare_tcp(Packet *spkt, Packet *ppkt)
> static int colo_packet_compare_udp(Packet *spkt, Packet *ppkt)
> {
> int ret;
> + int network_length = ppkt->ip->ip_hl * 4;
network_header_length looks better.
>
> trace_colo_compare_main("compare udp");
>
> - ret = colo_packet_compare_common(ppkt, spkt);
> + /*
> + * Because of ppkt and spkt are both in the same connection,
> + * The ppkt's src ip, dst ip, src port, dst port, ip_proto all are
> + * same with spkt. In addition, IP header's Identification is a random
> + * field, we can handle it in IP fragmentation function later.
> + * So we just compare the ip payload here.
> + */
I'm afraid there're some other fields were ignored e.g TOS,TTL, and
options. We'd better explain this in the comment too.
> + ret = colo_packet_compare_common(ppkt, spkt, network_length + ETH_HLEN);
>
> if (ret) {
> trace_colo_compare_udp_miscompare("primary pkt size", ppkt->size);
> @@ -284,9 +289,18 @@ static int colo_packet_compare_udp(Packet *spkt, Packet *ppkt)
> */
> static int colo_packet_compare_icmp(Packet *spkt, Packet *ppkt)
> {
> + int network_length = ppkt->ip->ip_hl * 4;
> +
> trace_colo_compare_main("compare icmp");
>
> - if (colo_packet_compare_common(ppkt, spkt)) {
> + /*
> + * Because of ppkt and spkt are both in the same connection,
> + * The ppkt's src ip, dst ip, src port, dst port, ip_proto all are
> + * same with spkt. In addition, IP header's Identification is a random
> + * field, we can handle it in IP fragmentation function later.
> + * So we just compare the ip payload here.
> + */
> + if (colo_packet_compare_common(ppkt, spkt, network_length + ETH_HLEN)) {
> trace_colo_compare_icmp_miscompare("primary pkt size",
> ppkt->size);
> qemu_hexdump((char *)ppkt->data, stderr, "colo-compare",
> @@ -312,7 +326,7 @@ static int colo_packet_compare_other(Packet *spkt, Packet *ppkt)
> inet_ntoa(ppkt->ip->ip_dst), spkt->size,
> inet_ntoa(spkt->ip->ip_src),
> inet_ntoa(spkt->ip->ip_dst));
> - return colo_packet_compare_common(ppkt, spkt);
> + return colo_packet_compare_common(ppkt, spkt, 0);
> }
>
> static int colo_old_packet_check_one(Packet *pkt, int64_t *check_time)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH V2 2/3] COLO-compare: Optimize compare_common and compare_tcp
2017-02-28 5:47 ` Jason Wang
@ 2017-02-28 6:11 ` Zhang Chen
2017-03-02 7:51 ` Jason Wang
0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Zhang Chen @ 2017-02-28 6:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jason Wang, qemu devel
Cc: zhangchen.fnst, zhanghailiang, eddie . dong, bian naimeng,
Li Zhijian
On 02/28/2017 01:47 PM, Jason Wang wrote:
>
>
> On 2017年02月28日 13:18, Zhang Chen wrote:
>> Add offset args for colo_packet_compare_common, optimize
>> colo_packet_compare_icmp() and colo_packet_compare_udp()
>> just compare the IP payload. Before compare all tcp packet,
>> we compare tcp checksum firstly, this function can get
>> better performance.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Zhang Chen <zhangchen.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
>> ---
>> net/colo-compare.c | 42 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
>> 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/net/colo-compare.c b/net/colo-compare.c
>> index 602a758..61fcdf2 100644
>> --- a/net/colo-compare.c
>> +++ b/net/colo-compare.c
>> @@ -180,7 +180,7 @@ static int packet_enqueue(CompareState *s, int mode)
>> * return: 0 means packet same
>> * > 0 || < 0 means packet different
>> */
>> -static int colo_packet_compare_common(Packet *ppkt, Packet *spkt)
>> +static int colo_packet_compare_common(Packet *ppkt, Packet *spkt,
>> int offset)
>> {
>> trace_colo_compare_ip_info(ppkt->size,
>> inet_ntoa(ppkt->ip->ip_src),
>> inet_ntoa(ppkt->ip->ip_dst), spkt->size,
>> @@ -188,7 +188,8 @@ static int colo_packet_compare_common(Packet
>> *ppkt, Packet *spkt)
>> inet_ntoa(spkt->ip->ip_dst));
>> if (ppkt->size == spkt->size) {
>> - return memcmp(ppkt->data, spkt->data, spkt->size);
>> + return memcmp(ppkt->data + offset, spkt->data + offset,
>> + spkt->size - offset);
>> } else {
>> trace_colo_compare_main("Net packet size are not the same");
>> return -1;
>> @@ -207,13 +208,6 @@ static int colo_packet_compare_tcp(Packet *spkt,
>> Packet *ppkt)
>> trace_colo_compare_main("compare tcp");
>> - if (ppkt->size != spkt->size) {
>> - if (trace_event_get_state(TRACE_COLO_COMPARE_MISCOMPARE)) {
>> - trace_colo_compare_main("pkt size not same");
>> - }
>> - return -1;
>> - }
>> -
>> ptcp = (struct tcphdr *)ppkt->transport_header;
>> stcp = (struct tcphdr *)spkt->transport_header;
>> @@ -231,8 +225,11 @@ static int colo_packet_compare_tcp(Packet
>> *spkt, Packet *ppkt)
>> spkt->ip->ip_sum = ppkt->ip->ip_sum;
>> }
>> - res = memcmp(ppkt->data + ETH_HLEN, spkt->data + ETH_HLEN,
>> - (spkt->size - ETH_HLEN));
>> + if (ptcp->th_sum == stcp->th_sum) {
>> + res = colo_packet_compare_common(ppkt, spkt, ETH_HLEN);
>> + } else {
>> + res = -1;
>> + }
>> if (res != 0 &&
>> trace_event_get_state(TRACE_COLO_COMPARE_MISCOMPARE)) {
>> trace_colo_compare_pkt_info_src(inet_ntoa(ppkt->ip->ip_src),
>> @@ -263,10 +260,18 @@ static int colo_packet_compare_tcp(Packet
>> *spkt, Packet *ppkt)
>> static int colo_packet_compare_udp(Packet *spkt, Packet *ppkt)
>> {
>> int ret;
>> + int network_length = ppkt->ip->ip_hl * 4;
>
> network_header_length looks better.
OK, I will rename it.
>
>> trace_colo_compare_main("compare udp");
>> - ret = colo_packet_compare_common(ppkt, spkt);
>> + /*
>> + * Because of ppkt and spkt are both in the same connection,
>> + * The ppkt's src ip, dst ip, src port, dst port, ip_proto all are
>> + * same with spkt. In addition, IP header's Identification is a
>> random
>> + * field, we can handle it in IP fragmentation function later.
>> + * So we just compare the ip payload here.
>> + */
>
> I'm afraid there're some other fields were ignored e.g TOS,TTL, and
> options. We'd better explain this in the comment too.
OK, How about this?
+ /*
+ * Because of ppkt and spkt are both in the same connection,
+ * The ppkt's src ip, dst ip, src port, dst port, ip_proto all are
+ * same with spkt. In addition, IP header's Identification is a random
+ * field, we can handle it in IP fragmentation function later.
+ * So we just compare the ip payload here. we ignored all IP header
+ * include other field like TOS,TTL,IP Checksum.
+ */
Thanks
Zhang Chen
>
>> + ret = colo_packet_compare_common(ppkt, spkt, network_length +
>> ETH_HLEN);
>> if (ret) {
>> trace_colo_compare_udp_miscompare("primary pkt size",
>> ppkt->size);
>> @@ -284,9 +289,18 @@ static int colo_packet_compare_udp(Packet *spkt,
>> Packet *ppkt)
>> */
>> static int colo_packet_compare_icmp(Packet *spkt, Packet *ppkt)
>> {
>> + int network_length = ppkt->ip->ip_hl * 4;
>> +
>> trace_colo_compare_main("compare icmp");
>> - if (colo_packet_compare_common(ppkt, spkt)) {
>> + /*
>> + * Because of ppkt and spkt are both in the same connection,
>> + * The ppkt's src ip, dst ip, src port, dst port, ip_proto all are
>> + * same with spkt. In addition, IP header's Identification is a
>> random
>> + * field, we can handle it in IP fragmentation function later.
>> + * So we just compare the ip payload here.
>> + */
>> + if (colo_packet_compare_common(ppkt, spkt, network_length +
>> ETH_HLEN)) {
>> trace_colo_compare_icmp_miscompare("primary pkt size",
>> ppkt->size);
>> qemu_hexdump((char *)ppkt->data, stderr, "colo-compare",
>> @@ -312,7 +326,7 @@ static int colo_packet_compare_other(Packet
>> *spkt, Packet *ppkt)
>> inet_ntoa(ppkt->ip->ip_dst), spkt->size,
>> inet_ntoa(spkt->ip->ip_src),
>> inet_ntoa(spkt->ip->ip_dst));
>> - return colo_packet_compare_common(ppkt, spkt);
>> + return colo_packet_compare_common(ppkt, spkt, 0);
>> }
>> static int colo_old_packet_check_one(Packet *pkt, int64_t
>> *check_time)
>
>
>
> .
>
--
Thanks
Zhang Chen
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH V2 2/3] COLO-compare: Optimize compare_common and compare_tcp
2017-02-28 6:11 ` Zhang Chen
@ 2017-03-02 7:51 ` Jason Wang
2017-03-02 8:15 ` Zhang Chen
0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Jason Wang @ 2017-03-02 7:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Zhang Chen, qemu devel
Cc: Li Zhijian, bian naimeng, eddie . dong, zhanghailiang
On 2017年02月28日 14:11, Zhang Chen wrote:
>>
>
> OK, How about this?
>
> + /*
> + * Because of ppkt and spkt are both in the same connection,
> + * The ppkt's src ip, dst ip, src port, dst port, ip_proto all are
> + * same with spkt. In addition, IP header's Identification is a
> random
> + * field, we can handle it in IP fragmentation function later.
> + * So we just compare the ip payload here. we ignored all IP header
> + * include other field like TOS,TTL,IP Checksum.
> + */
>
> Thanks
> Zhang Chen
But this does not explain why we can ignore those fields.
Thanks
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH V2 2/3] COLO-compare: Optimize compare_common and compare_tcp
2017-03-02 7:51 ` Jason Wang
@ 2017-03-02 8:15 ` Zhang Chen
2017-03-02 9:35 ` Jason Wang
0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Zhang Chen @ 2017-03-02 8:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jason Wang, qemu devel
Cc: zhangchen.fnst, Li Zhijian, bian naimeng, eddie . dong,
zhanghailiang
On 03/02/2017 03:51 PM, Jason Wang wrote:
>
>
> On 2017年02月28日 14:11, Zhang Chen wrote:
>>>
>>
>> OK, How about this?
>>
>> + /*
>> + * Because of ppkt and spkt are both in the same connection,
>> + * The ppkt's src ip, dst ip, src port, dst port, ip_proto all are
>> + * same with spkt. In addition, IP header's Identification is a
>> random
>> + * field, we can handle it in IP fragmentation function later.
>> + * So we just compare the ip payload here. we ignored all IP header
>> + * include other field like TOS,TTL,IP Checksum.
>> + */
>>
>> Thanks
>> Zhang Chen
>
> But this does not explain why we can ignore those fields.
+ /*
+ * Because of ppkt and spkt are both in the same connection,
+ * The ppkt's src ip, dst ip, src port, dst port, ip_proto all are
+ * same with spkt. In addition, IP header's Identification is a random
+ * field, we can handle it in IP fragmentation function later.
+ * COLO just concern the response net packet payload from primary guest
+ * and secondary guest are same or not, So we ignored all IP header
include
+ * other field like TOS,TTL,IP Checksum. we only need to compare
+ * the ip payload here.
+ */
How about this fixed comments?
Thanks
Zhang Chen
>
> Thanks
>
>
>
--
Thanks
Zhang Chen
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH V2 2/3] COLO-compare: Optimize compare_common and compare_tcp
2017-03-02 8:15 ` Zhang Chen
@ 2017-03-02 9:35 ` Jason Wang
0 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Jason Wang @ 2017-03-02 9:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Zhang Chen, qemu devel
Cc: eddie . dong, bian naimeng, Li Zhijian, zhanghailiang
On 2017年03月02日 16:15, Zhang Chen wrote:
>
>
> On 03/02/2017 03:51 PM, Jason Wang wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 2017年02月28日 14:11, Zhang Chen wrote:
>>>>
>>>
>>> OK, How about this?
>>>
>>> + /*
>>> + * Because of ppkt and spkt are both in the same connection,
>>> + * The ppkt's src ip, dst ip, src port, dst port, ip_proto all are
>>> + * same with spkt. In addition, IP header's Identification is a
>>> random
>>> + * field, we can handle it in IP fragmentation function later.
>>> + * So we just compare the ip payload here. we ignored all IP
>>> header
>>> + * include other field like TOS,TTL,IP Checksum.
>>> + */
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>> Zhang Chen
>>
>> But this does not explain why we can ignore those fields.
>
> + /*
> + * Because of ppkt and spkt are both in the same connection,
> + * The ppkt's src ip, dst ip, src port, dst port, ip_proto all are
> + * same with spkt. In addition, IP header's Identification is a
> random
> + * field, we can handle it in IP fragmentation function later.
> + * COLO just concern the response net packet payload from primary
> guest
> + * and secondary guest are same or not, So we ignored all IP
> header include
> + * other field like TOS,TTL,IP Checksum. we only need to compare
> + * the ip payload here.
> + */
>
> How about this fixed comments?
>
> Thanks
> Zhang Chen
>
>
Looks ok.
Thanks
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>>
>>
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2017-03-02 9:35 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2017-02-28 5:18 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH V2 0/3] COLO-compare: Optimize the code and fix some bug Zhang Chen
2017-02-28 5:18 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH V2 1/3] COLO-compare: Rename compare function and remove duplicate codes Zhang Chen
2017-02-28 5:18 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH V2 2/3] COLO-compare: Optimize compare_common and compare_tcp Zhang Chen
2017-02-28 5:47 ` Jason Wang
2017-02-28 6:11 ` Zhang Chen
2017-03-02 7:51 ` Jason Wang
2017-03-02 8:15 ` Zhang Chen
2017-03-02 9:35 ` Jason Wang
2017-02-28 5:18 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH V2 3/3] COLO-compare: Fix icmp and udp compare different packet always dump bug Zhang Chen
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).