From: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
qemu-trivial@nongnu.org, Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@ozlabs.ru>,
Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>, Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Subject: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] docs: Add a note about mixing bootindex with "-boot order"
Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2017 18:40:01 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1488303601-23741-1-git-send-email-thuth@redhat.com> (raw)
Occasionally the users try to mix the bootindex properties with the
"-boot order" parameter - and this likely does not give the expected
results. So let's add a proper statement that these two concepts
should not be used together.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
---
docs/bootindex.txt | 9 +++++++++
qemu-options.hx | 5 ++++-
2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/docs/bootindex.txt b/docs/bootindex.txt
index f84fac7..9e0ac07 100644
--- a/docs/bootindex.txt
+++ b/docs/bootindex.txt
@@ -41,3 +41,12 @@ has three bootable devices target1, target3, target5 connected to it,
the option ROM will have a boot method for each of them, but it is not
possible to map from boot method back to a specific target. This is a
shortcoming of the PC BIOS boot specification.
+
+== Mixing bootindex and boot order parameters ==
+
+Note that it does not make sense to use the bootindex property together
+with the "-boot order=..." (or "-boot once=...") parameter. The guest
+firmware implementations normally either support the one or the other,
+but not both parameters at the same time. Mixing them will result in
+undefined behavior, and thus the guest firmware will likely not boot
+from the expected devices.
diff --git a/qemu-options.hx b/qemu-options.hx
index bf458f8..aa11420 100644
--- a/qemu-options.hx
+++ b/qemu-options.hx
@@ -234,7 +234,10 @@ drive letters depend on the target architecture. The x86 PC uses: a, b
(floppy 1 and 2), c (first hard disk), d (first CD-ROM), n-p (Etherboot
from network adapter 1-4), hard disk boot is the default. To apply a
particular boot order only on the first startup, specify it via
-@option{once}.
+@option{once}. Note that the @option{order} or @option{once} parameter
+should not be used together with the @option{bootindex} property of
+devices, since the firmware implementations normally do not support both
+at the same time.
Interactive boot menus/prompts can be enabled via @option{menu=on} as far
as firmware/BIOS supports them. The default is non-interactive boot.
--
1.8.3.1
next reply other threads:[~2017-02-28 17:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-02-28 17:40 Thomas Huth [this message]
2017-02-28 18:41 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] docs: Add a note about mixing bootindex with "-boot order" Eric Blake
2017-02-28 20:55 ` Laszlo Ersek
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1488303601-23741-1-git-send-email-thuth@redhat.com \
--to=thuth@redhat.com \
--cc=aik@ozlabs.ru \
--cc=eblake@redhat.com \
--cc=lersek@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-trivial@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).