qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Zhang Chen <zhangchen.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
To: qemu devel <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>, Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
Cc: Zhang Chen <zhangchen.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>,
	zhanghailiang <zhang.zhanghailiang@huawei.com>,
	"eddie . dong" <eddie.dong@intel.com>,
	bian naimeng <biannm@cn.fujitsu.com>,
	Li Zhijian <lizhijian@cn.fujitsu.com>
Subject: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH V3 2/3] COLO-compare: Optimize compare_common and compare_tcp
Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2017 17:54:17 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1488448458-4976-3-git-send-email-zhangchen.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1488448458-4976-1-git-send-email-zhangchen.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>

Add offset args for colo_packet_compare_common, optimize
colo_packet_compare_icmp() and colo_packet_compare_udp()
just compare the IP payload. Before compare all tcp packet,
we compare tcp checksum firstly, this function can get
better performance.

Signed-off-by: Zhang Chen <zhangchen.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
---
 net/colo-compare.c | 50 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
 1 file changed, 36 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/colo-compare.c b/net/colo-compare.c
index 602a758..9f5968d 100644
--- a/net/colo-compare.c
+++ b/net/colo-compare.c
@@ -180,7 +180,7 @@ static int packet_enqueue(CompareState *s, int mode)
  * return:    0  means packet same
  *            > 0 || < 0 means packet different
  */
-static int colo_packet_compare_common(Packet *ppkt, Packet *spkt)
+static int colo_packet_compare_common(Packet *ppkt, Packet *spkt, int offset)
 {
     trace_colo_compare_ip_info(ppkt->size, inet_ntoa(ppkt->ip->ip_src),
                                inet_ntoa(ppkt->ip->ip_dst), spkt->size,
@@ -188,7 +188,8 @@ static int colo_packet_compare_common(Packet *ppkt, Packet *spkt)
                                inet_ntoa(spkt->ip->ip_dst));
 
     if (ppkt->size == spkt->size) {
-        return memcmp(ppkt->data, spkt->data, spkt->size);
+        return memcmp(ppkt->data + offset, spkt->data + offset,
+                      spkt->size - offset);
     } else {
         trace_colo_compare_main("Net packet size are not the same");
         return -1;
@@ -207,13 +208,6 @@ static int colo_packet_compare_tcp(Packet *spkt, Packet *ppkt)
 
     trace_colo_compare_main("compare tcp");
 
-    if (ppkt->size != spkt->size) {
-        if (trace_event_get_state(TRACE_COLO_COMPARE_MISCOMPARE)) {
-            trace_colo_compare_main("pkt size not same");
-        }
-        return -1;
-    }
-
     ptcp = (struct tcphdr *)ppkt->transport_header;
     stcp = (struct tcphdr *)spkt->transport_header;
 
@@ -231,8 +225,11 @@ static int colo_packet_compare_tcp(Packet *spkt, Packet *ppkt)
         spkt->ip->ip_sum = ppkt->ip->ip_sum;
     }
 
-    res = memcmp(ppkt->data + ETH_HLEN, spkt->data + ETH_HLEN,
-                (spkt->size - ETH_HLEN));
+    if (ptcp->th_sum == stcp->th_sum) {
+        res = colo_packet_compare_common(ppkt, spkt, ETH_HLEN);
+    } else {
+        res = -1;
+    }
 
     if (res != 0 && trace_event_get_state(TRACE_COLO_COMPARE_MISCOMPARE)) {
         trace_colo_compare_pkt_info_src(inet_ntoa(ppkt->ip->ip_src),
@@ -263,10 +260,22 @@ static int colo_packet_compare_tcp(Packet *spkt, Packet *ppkt)
 static int colo_packet_compare_udp(Packet *spkt, Packet *ppkt)
 {
     int ret;
+    int network_header_length = ppkt->ip->ip_hl * 4;
 
     trace_colo_compare_main("compare udp");
 
-    ret = colo_packet_compare_common(ppkt, spkt);
+    /*
+     * Because of ppkt and spkt are both in the same connection,
+     * The ppkt's src ip, dst ip, src port, dst port, ip_proto all are
+     * same with spkt. In addition, IP header's Identification is a random
+     * field, we can handle it in IP fragmentation function later.
+     * COLO just concern the response net packet payload from primary guest
+     * and secondary guest are same or not, So we ignored all IP header include
+     * other field like TOS,TTL,IP Checksum. we only need to compare
+     * the ip payload here.
+     */
+    ret = colo_packet_compare_common(ppkt, spkt,
+                                     network_header_length + ETH_HLEN);
 
     if (ret) {
         trace_colo_compare_udp_miscompare("primary pkt size", ppkt->size);
@@ -284,9 +293,22 @@ static int colo_packet_compare_udp(Packet *spkt, Packet *ppkt)
  */
 static int colo_packet_compare_icmp(Packet *spkt, Packet *ppkt)
 {
+    int network_header_length = ppkt->ip->ip_hl * 4;
+
     trace_colo_compare_main("compare icmp");
 
-    if (colo_packet_compare_common(ppkt, spkt)) {
+    /*
+     * Because of ppkt and spkt are both in the same connection,
+     * The ppkt's src ip, dst ip, src port, dst port, ip_proto all are
+     * same with spkt. In addition, IP header's Identification is a random
+     * field, we can handle it in IP fragmentation function later.
+     * COLO just concern the response net packet payload from primary guest
+     * and secondary guest are same or not, So we ignored all IP header include
+     * other field like TOS,TTL,IP Checksum. we only need to compare
+     * the ip payload here.
+     */
+    if (colo_packet_compare_common(ppkt, spkt,
+                                   network_header_length + ETH_HLEN)) {
         trace_colo_compare_icmp_miscompare("primary pkt size",
                                            ppkt->size);
         qemu_hexdump((char *)ppkt->data, stderr, "colo-compare",
@@ -312,7 +334,7 @@ static int colo_packet_compare_other(Packet *spkt, Packet *ppkt)
                                inet_ntoa(ppkt->ip->ip_dst), spkt->size,
                                inet_ntoa(spkt->ip->ip_src),
                                inet_ntoa(spkt->ip->ip_dst));
-    return colo_packet_compare_common(ppkt, spkt);
+    return colo_packet_compare_common(ppkt, spkt, 0);
 }
 
 static int colo_old_packet_check_one(Packet *pkt, int64_t *check_time)
-- 
2.7.4

  parent reply	other threads:[~2017-03-02  9:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-03-02  9:54 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH V3 0/3] COLO-compare: Optimize the code and fix some bug Zhang Chen
2017-03-02  9:54 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH V3 1/3] COLO-compare: Rename compare function and remove duplicate codes Zhang Chen
2017-03-02  9:54 ` Zhang Chen [this message]
2017-03-02  9:54 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH V3 3/3] COLO-compare: Fix icmp and udp compare different packet always dump bug Zhang Chen
2017-03-06  5:21 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH V3 0/3] COLO-compare: Optimize the code and fix some bug Jason Wang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1488448458-4976-3-git-send-email-zhangchen.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --to=zhangchen.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=biannm@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=eddie.dong@intel.com \
    --cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
    --cc=lizhijian@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=zhang.zhanghailiang@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).