From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:58682) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1geJ8e-0001O4-4P for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 01 Jan 2019 07:27:16 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1geJ8d-00022B-EB for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 01 Jan 2019 07:27:16 -0500 Received: from mail-wr1-x444.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::444]:39601) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1geJ8d-00021i-8F for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 01 Jan 2019 07:27:15 -0500 Received: by mail-wr1-x444.google.com with SMTP id t27so28141664wra.6 for ; Tue, 01 Jan 2019 04:27:15 -0800 (PST) From: "=?UTF-8?B?Wm9sdMOhbiBLxZF2w6Fnw7M=?=" References: Message-ID: <148c959b-c2cf-bf80-b8ec-6f0365b914af@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 1 Jan 2019 13:27:07 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 00/52] Audio 5.1 patches List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Programmingkid Cc: QEMU Developers , Gerd Hoffmann On 2019-01-01 05:24, Programmingkid wrote: >> On 2018-12-29 01:49, Programmingkid wrote: [snip] >>> >>> I tried ac97 with a Windows 2000 guest in qemu-system-i386 - same demonic sound. >>> With the above configuration but with an es1370 sound card I heard the same sound. I kept seeing "es1370: warning: non looping mode" being printed in the terminal. This problem might need its own patch. >>> Using the sb16 sound card I heard the same unsettling sound. >>> >>> I could not test the HDA driver due to problems with my Windows 7 VM. >>> >> >> >> I have a feeling that bf870a0cf5e2c2dd7438e65473b4fca1fb0ca5d1 >> (coreaudio: port to the new audio backend api) is the commit which >> breaks it, but without a mac I don't know how could I debug it. The way >> it initializes coreaudio changed a bit, that can cause problems. >> Could you please test whether this commit is the culprit or not? >> >> Regards, >> Zoltan > > > Hi how do you want me to test your theory? Revert the patch? If I did I don't think QEMU would still compile. No, don't revert it, that would generate too many conflicts. Just git checkout bf870a0c and git checkout bf870a0c~ should give you two versions that you can compare. Regards, Zoltan