From: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
To: mst@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: maxime.coquelin@redhat.com, Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>,
Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Subject: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH for 2.9] vhost: generalize iommu memory region
Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2017 12:10:04 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1490760604-9756-1-git-send-email-jasowang@redhat.com> (raw)
We assumes the iommu_ops were attached to the root region of address
space. This may not be true for all kinds of IOMMU implementation and
especially after commit 3716d5902d74 ("pci: introduce a bus master
container"). So fix this by not assuming as->root has iommu_ops,
instead depending on the regions reported by memory listener through:
- register a memory listener to dma_as
- during region_add, if it's a region of IOMMU, register a specific
IOMMU notifier, and store all notifiers in a list.
- during region_del, compare and delete the IOMMU notifier from the list
This is also a must for making vhost device IOTLB works for all types
of IOMMUs. Note, since we register one notifier during each
.region_add, the IOTLB may be flushed more than one times, this is
suboptimal and could be optimized in the future.
Reported-by: Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coquelin@redhat.com>
Fixes: 3716d5902d74 ("pci: introduce a bus master container")
Cc: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
---
hw/virtio/vhost.c | 84 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
include/hw/virtio/vhost.h | 11 +++++++
2 files changed, 75 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
diff --git a/hw/virtio/vhost.c b/hw/virtio/vhost.c
index febe519..613494d 100644
--- a/hw/virtio/vhost.c
+++ b/hw/virtio/vhost.c
@@ -425,10 +425,8 @@ static inline void vhost_dev_log_resize(struct vhost_dev *dev, uint64_t size)
static int vhost_dev_has_iommu(struct vhost_dev *dev)
{
VirtIODevice *vdev = dev->vdev;
- AddressSpace *dma_as = vdev->dma_as;
- return memory_region_is_iommu(dma_as->root) &&
- virtio_host_has_feature(vdev, VIRTIO_F_IOMMU_PLATFORM);
+ return virtio_host_has_feature(vdev, VIRTIO_F_IOMMU_PLATFORM);
}
static void *vhost_memory_map(struct vhost_dev *dev, hwaddr addr,
@@ -720,6 +718,63 @@ static void vhost_region_del(MemoryListener *listener,
}
}
+static void vhost_iommu_unmap_notify(IOMMUNotifier *n, IOMMUTLBEntry *iotlb)
+{
+ struct vhost_iommu *iommu = container_of(n, struct vhost_iommu, n);
+ struct vhost_dev *hdev = iommu->hdev;
+ hwaddr iova = iotlb->iova + iommu->iommu_offset;
+
+ if (hdev->vhost_ops->vhost_invalidate_device_iotlb(hdev, iova,
+ iotlb->addr_mask + 1)) {
+ error_report("Fail to invalidate device iotlb");
+ }
+}
+
+static void vhost_iommu_region_add(MemoryListener *listener,
+ MemoryRegionSection *section)
+{
+ struct vhost_dev *dev = container_of(listener, struct vhost_dev,
+ iommu_listener);
+ struct vhost_iommu *iommu;
+
+ if (!memory_region_is_iommu(section->mr)) {
+ return;
+ }
+
+ iommu = g_malloc0(sizeof(*iommu));
+ iommu->n.notify = vhost_iommu_unmap_notify;
+ iommu->n.notifier_flags = IOMMU_NOTIFIER_UNMAP;
+ iommu->mr = section->mr;
+ iommu->iommu_offset = section->offset_within_address_space -
+ section->offset_within_region;
+ iommu->hdev = dev;
+ memory_region_register_iommu_notifier(section->mr, &iommu->n);
+ QLIST_INSERT_HEAD(&dev->iommu_list, iommu, iommu_next);
+ /* TODO: can replay help performance here? */
+}
+
+static void vhost_iommu_region_del(MemoryListener *listener,
+ MemoryRegionSection *section)
+{
+ struct vhost_dev *dev = container_of(listener, struct vhost_dev,
+ iommu_listener);
+ struct vhost_iommu *iommu;
+
+ if (!memory_region_is_iommu(section->mr)) {
+ return;
+ }
+
+ QLIST_FOREACH(iommu, &dev->iommu_list, iommu_next) {
+ if (iommu->mr == section->mr) {
+ memory_region_unregister_iommu_notifier(iommu->mr,
+ &iommu->n);
+ QLIST_REMOVE(iommu, iommu_next);
+ g_free(iommu);
+ break;
+ }
+ }
+}
+
static void vhost_region_nop(MemoryListener *listener,
MemoryRegionSection *section)
{
@@ -1161,17 +1216,6 @@ static void vhost_virtqueue_cleanup(struct vhost_virtqueue *vq)
event_notifier_cleanup(&vq->masked_notifier);
}
-static void vhost_iommu_unmap_notify(IOMMUNotifier *n, IOMMUTLBEntry *iotlb)
-{
- struct vhost_dev *hdev = container_of(n, struct vhost_dev, n);
-
- if (hdev->vhost_ops->vhost_invalidate_device_iotlb(hdev,
- iotlb->iova,
- iotlb->addr_mask + 1)) {
- error_report("Fail to invalidate device iotlb");
- }
-}
-
int vhost_dev_init(struct vhost_dev *hdev, void *opaque,
VhostBackendType backend_type, uint32_t busyloop_timeout)
{
@@ -1244,8 +1288,10 @@ int vhost_dev_init(struct vhost_dev *hdev, void *opaque,
.priority = 10
};
- hdev->n.notify = vhost_iommu_unmap_notify;
- hdev->n.notifier_flags = IOMMU_NOTIFIER_UNMAP;
+ hdev->iommu_listener = (MemoryListener) {
+ .region_add = vhost_iommu_region_add,
+ .region_del = vhost_iommu_region_del,
+ };
if (hdev->migration_blocker == NULL) {
if (!(hdev->features & (0x1ULL << VHOST_F_LOG_ALL))) {
@@ -1455,8 +1501,7 @@ int vhost_dev_start(struct vhost_dev *hdev, VirtIODevice *vdev)
}
if (vhost_dev_has_iommu(hdev)) {
- memory_region_register_iommu_notifier(vdev->dma_as->root,
- &hdev->n);
+ memory_listener_register(&hdev->iommu_listener, vdev->dma_as);
}
r = hdev->vhost_ops->vhost_set_mem_table(hdev, hdev->mem);
@@ -1538,8 +1583,7 @@ void vhost_dev_stop(struct vhost_dev *hdev, VirtIODevice *vdev)
if (vhost_dev_has_iommu(hdev)) {
hdev->vhost_ops->vhost_set_iotlb_callback(hdev, false);
- memory_region_unregister_iommu_notifier(vdev->dma_as->root,
- &hdev->n);
+ memory_listener_unregister(&hdev->iommu_listener);
}
vhost_log_put(hdev, true);
hdev->started = false;
diff --git a/include/hw/virtio/vhost.h b/include/hw/virtio/vhost.h
index 52f633e..a450321 100644
--- a/include/hw/virtio/vhost.h
+++ b/include/hw/virtio/vhost.h
@@ -37,10 +37,20 @@ struct vhost_log {
vhost_log_chunk_t *log;
};
+struct vhost_dev;
+struct vhost_iommu {
+ struct vhost_dev *hdev;
+ MemoryRegion *mr;
+ hwaddr iommu_offset;
+ IOMMUNotifier n;
+ QLIST_ENTRY(vhost_iommu) iommu_next;
+};
+
struct vhost_memory;
struct vhost_dev {
VirtIODevice *vdev;
MemoryListener memory_listener;
+ MemoryListener iommu_listener;
struct vhost_memory *mem;
int n_mem_sections;
MemoryRegionSection *mem_sections;
@@ -64,6 +74,7 @@ struct vhost_dev {
void *opaque;
struct vhost_log *log;
QLIST_ENTRY(vhost_dev) entry;
+ QLIST_HEAD(, vhost_iommu) iommu_list;
IOMMUNotifier n;
};
--
2.7.4
next reply other threads:[~2017-03-29 4:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-03-29 4:10 Jason Wang [this message]
2017-03-29 6:12 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH for 2.9] vhost: generalize iommu memory region Peter Xu
2017-03-29 7:07 ` Maxime Coquelin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1490760604-9756-1-git-send-email-jasowang@redhat.com \
--to=jasowang@redhat.com \
--cc=maxime.coquelin@redhat.com \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=peterx@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).