From: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
To: qemu-block@nongnu.org
Cc: kwolf@redhat.com, mreitz@redhat.com, eblake@redhat.com,
rjones@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH for-2.9] block: Don't check permissions for copy on read
Date: Fri, 7 Apr 2017 12:32:45 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1491561165-12415-1-git-send-email-kwolf@redhat.com> (raw)
The assertion is currently failing. We can't require callers to have
write permissions when all they are doing is a read, so comment it out.
Add a FIXME comment in the code so that the check is re-enabled when
copy on read is refactored into its own filter driver.
Reported-by: Richard W.M. Jones <rjones@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
---
block/io.c | 9 ++++++++-
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/block/io.c b/block/io.c
index 2709a70..7321dda 100644
--- a/block/io.c
+++ b/block/io.c
@@ -945,7 +945,14 @@ static int coroutine_fn bdrv_co_do_copy_on_readv(BdrvChild *child,
size_t skip_bytes;
int ret;
- assert(child->perm & (BLK_PERM_WRITE_UNCHANGED | BLK_PERM_WRITE));
+ /* FIXME We cannot require callers to have write permissions when all they
+ * are doing is a read request. If we did things right, write permissions
+ * would be obtained anyway, but internally by the copy-on-read code. As
+ * long as it is implemented here rather than in a separat filter driver,
+ * the copy-on-read code doesn't have its own BdrvChild, however, for which
+ * it could request permissions. Therefore we have to bypass the permission
+ * system for the moment. */
+ // assert(child->perm & (BLK_PERM_WRITE_UNCHANGED | BLK_PERM_WRITE));
/* Cover entire cluster so no additional backing file I/O is required when
* allocating cluster in the image file.
--
1.8.3.1
next reply other threads:[~2017-04-07 10:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-04-07 10:32 Kevin Wolf [this message]
2017-04-07 10:42 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH for-2.9] block: Don't check permissions for copy on read Richard W.M. Jones
2017-04-07 13:53 ` Eric Blake
2017-04-07 14:01 ` Max Reitz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1491561165-12415-1-git-send-email-kwolf@redhat.com \
--to=kwolf@redhat.com \
--cc=eblake@redhat.com \
--cc=mreitz@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-block@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=rjones@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).