From: Jose Ricardo Ziviani <joserz@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: alex.williamson@redhat.com, pbonzini@redhat.com,
mdroth@linux.vnet.ibm.com, aik@ozlabs.ru
Subject: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/2] vfio: Set MemoryRegionOps:max_access_size and min_access_size
Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2017 16:44:42 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1492631083-23965-2-git-send-email-joserz@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1492631083-23965-1-git-send-email-joserz@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Sets valid.max_access_size and valid.min_access_size to ensure safe
8-byte accesses to vfio. Today, 8-byte accesses are broken into pairs
of 4-byte calls that goes unprotected:
qemu_mutex_lock locked mutex 0x10905ad8
vfio_region_write (0001:03:00.0:region1+0xc0, 0x2020c, 4)
qemu_mutex_unlock unlocked mutex 0x10905ad8
qemu_mutex_lock locked mutex 0x10905ad8
vfio_region_write (0001:03:00.0:region1+0xc4, 0xa0000, 4)
qemu_mutex_unlock unlocked mutex 0x10905ad8
which occasionally leads to:
qemu_mutex_lock locked mutex 0x10905ad8
vfio_region_write (0001:03:00.0:region1+0xc0, 0x2030c, 4)
qemu_mutex_unlock unlocked mutex 0x10905ad8
qemu_mutex_lock locked mutex 0x10905ad8
vfio_region_write (0001:03:00.0:region1+0xc0, 0x1000c, 4)
qemu_mutex_unlock unlocked mutex 0x10905ad8
qemu_mutex_lock locked mutex 0x10905ad8
vfio_region_write (0001:03:00.0:region1+0xc4, 0xb0000, 4)
qemu_mutex_unlock unlocked mutex 0x10905ad8
qemu_mutex_lock locked mutex 0x10905ad8
vfio_region_write (0001:03:00.0:region1+0xc4, 0xa0000, 4)
qemu_mutex_unlock unlocked mutex 0x10905ad8
causing strange errors in guest OS. With this patch, such accesses
are protected by the same lock guard:
qemu_mutex_lock locked mutex 0x10905ad8
vfio_region_write (0001:03:00.0:region1+0xc0, 0x2000c, 4)
vfio_region_write (0001:03:00.0:region1+0xc4, 0xb0000, 4)
qemu_mutex_unlock unlocked mutex 0x10905ad8
This happens because the 8-byte write should be broken into 4-byte
writes by memory.c:access_with_adjusted_size() in order to be under
the same lock. Today, it's done in exec.c:address_space_write_continue()
which was able to handle only 4 bytes due to a zero'ed
valid.max_access_size (see exec.c:memory_access_size()).
Signed-off-by: Jose Ricardo Ziviani <joserz@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
hw/vfio/common.c | 4 ++++
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
diff --git a/hw/vfio/common.c b/hw/vfio/common.c
index f3ba9b9..145f2f4 100644
--- a/hw/vfio/common.c
+++ b/hw/vfio/common.c
@@ -190,6 +190,10 @@ const MemoryRegionOps vfio_region_ops = {
.read = vfio_region_read,
.write = vfio_region_write,
.endianness = DEVICE_LITTLE_ENDIAN,
+ .valid = {
+ .min_access_size = 1,
+ .max_access_size = 8,
+ },
};
/*
--
2.7.4
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-04-19 19:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-04-19 19:44 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/2] VFIO: Make 8-byte accesses atomic Jose Ricardo Ziviani
2017-04-19 19:44 ` Jose Ricardo Ziviani [this message]
2017-04-19 19:44 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/2] vfio: enable 8-byte reads/writes to vfio Jose Ricardo Ziviani
2017-04-20 7:19 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/2] VFIO: Make 8-byte accesses atomic Richard Henderson
2017-04-20 16:03 ` Alex Williamson
2017-04-21 10:06 ` Paolo Bonzini
2017-04-21 15:51 ` Richard Henderson
2017-05-03 2:41 ` joserz
2017-05-03 2:52 ` Alex Williamson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1492631083-23965-2-git-send-email-joserz@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=joserz@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=aik@ozlabs.ru \
--cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
--cc=mdroth@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).