From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:53289)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <tracek@redhat.com>) id 1T2HD8-0001NK-1m
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 17 Aug 2012 03:43:14 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <tracek@redhat.com>) id 1T2HD7-0003zS-7C
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 17 Aug 2012 03:43:13 -0400
Received: from mx4-phx2.redhat.com ([209.132.183.25]:44472)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <tracek@redhat.com>) id 1T2HD6-0003zN-Ud
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 17 Aug 2012 03:43:13 -0400
Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2012 03:42:55 -0400 (EDT)
From: Tomas Racek <tracek@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <149466798.1924273.1345189375081.JavaMail.root@redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <502D666A.9080906@linux.intel.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] x86, nops settings result in kernel crash
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@linux.intel.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>, Alan Cox <alan@linux.intel.com>



----- Original Message -----
> On 08/16/2012 11:53 AM, Alan Cox wrote:
> >>
> >> Yes, if I remove the break statement (introduced by this commit),
> >> it works fine.
> > 
> > What version of qemu is this - do we have qemu bug here I wonder.
> > 
> 
> Also, is it 32 or 64 bits?

It's 64-bit.

Regards,

Tomas

> 
> 	-hpa
>