From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:54788)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <abologna@redhat.com>) id 1dBFOj-0000RW-RX
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 18 May 2017 02:58:58 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <abologna@redhat.com>) id 1dBFOg-0005K1-Rn
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 18 May 2017 02:58:57 -0400
Message-ID: <1495090729.4663.13.camel@redhat.com>
From: Andrea Bolognani <abologna@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 18 May 2017 08:58:49 +0200
In-Reply-To: <20170518045103.GT15596@umbus.fritz.box>
References: <20170517063547.23876-1-david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
	<1495011125.4663.5.camel@redhat.com>
	<20170518045103.GT15596@umbus.fritz.box>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC 0/2] pseries: Correct behaviour change for
 older machine types
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
Cc: thuth@redhat.com, lvivier@redhat.com, mdroth@linux.vnet.ibm.com, aik@ozlabs.ru, bharata@linux.vnet.ibm.com, qemu-ppc@nongnu.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org

On Thu, 2017-05-18 at 14:51 +1000, David Gibson wrote:
> > I gave it a spin and I can no longer reproduce the issue,
> > so for the entire series:
> >=20
> > Tested-by: Andrea Bolognani <abologna@redhat.com>
>=20
> I'm actually kind of astonished it worked at all given the bug that
> Laurent pointed out.

=C2=AF\_(=E3=83=84)_/=C2=AF

--=20
Andrea Bolognani / Red Hat / Virtualization