From: Zhang Chen <zhangchen.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
To: qemu devel <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>, Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
Cc: Zhang Chen <zhangchen.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>,
zhanghailiang <zhang.zhanghailiang@huawei.com>,
Li Zhijian <lizhijian@cn.fujitsu.com>,
"Dr . David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@redhat.com>
Subject: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH V3 3/4] net/colo-compare.c: Adjust net queue pop order for performance
Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2017 15:29:58 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1500449399-19107-4-git-send-email-zhangchen.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1500449399-19107-1-git-send-email-zhangchen.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
The packet_enqueue() use g_queue_push_tail() to
enqueue net packet, so it is more efficent way use
g_queue_pop_head() to get packet for compare.
That will improve the success rate of comparison.
In my test the performance of ftp put 1000M file
will increase 10%
Signed-off-by: Zhang Chen <zhangchen.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
---
net/colo-compare.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/colo-compare.c b/net/colo-compare.c
index 6aa5ea6..58c3250 100644
--- a/net/colo-compare.c
+++ b/net/colo-compare.c
@@ -489,7 +489,7 @@ static void colo_compare_connection(void *opaque, void *user_data)
while (!g_queue_is_empty(&conn->primary_list) &&
!g_queue_is_empty(&conn->secondary_list)) {
- pkt = g_queue_pop_tail(&conn->primary_list);
+ pkt = g_queue_pop_head(&conn->primary_list);
switch (conn->ip_proto) {
case IPPROTO_TCP:
result = g_queue_find_custom(&conn->secondary_list,
@@ -527,7 +527,7 @@ static void colo_compare_connection(void *opaque, void *user_data)
* until next comparison.
*/
trace_colo_compare_main("packet different");
- g_queue_push_tail(&conn->primary_list, pkt);
+ g_queue_push_head(&conn->primary_list, pkt);
if (pkt->creation_ms - s->checkpoint_time_ms >
CHECKPOINT_MIN_TIME) {
--
2.7.4
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-07-19 7:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-07-19 7:29 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH V3 0/4] Optimize COLO-compare performance Zhang Chen
2017-07-19 7:29 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH V3 1/4] net/colo-compare.c: Add checkpoint min period to optimize performance Zhang Chen
2017-07-19 7:29 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH V3 2/4] net/colo-compare.c: Optimize unpredictable tcp options comparison Zhang Chen
2017-07-19 7:29 ` Zhang Chen [this message]
2017-07-19 7:29 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH V3 4/4] net/colo-compare.c: Fix comments and scheme Zhang Chen
2017-07-19 10:20 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH V3 0/4] Optimize COLO-compare performance no-reply
2017-08-21 1:45 ` Zhang Chen
2017-08-21 3:55 ` Jason Wang
2017-08-21 5:17 ` Zhang Chen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1500449399-19107-4-git-send-email-zhangchen.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com \
--to=zhangchen.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=dgilbert@redhat.com \
--cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
--cc=lizhijian@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=zhang.zhanghailiang@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).