From: Mark Kanda <mark.kanda@oracle.com>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: pbonzini@redhat.com, konrad.wilk@oracle.com,
martin.petersen@oracle.com, Mark Kanda <mark.kanda@oracle.com>
Subject: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] Reject virtio-scsi configurations with logical block size > physical block size
Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2017 15:17:04 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1508185024-5840-1-git-send-email-mark.kanda@oracle.com> (raw)
With virtio-scsi, logical block size should never be larger than
physical block size. From an ATA/SCSI perspective, it makes no sense
to have the logical block size greater than the physical block size,
and it cannot even be effectively expressed in the command set. The
whole point of adding the physical block size to the ATA/SCSI command
set was to communicate a desire for a larger block size (than logical),
while maintaining backwards compatibility with legacy 512 byte block
size.
This was found by setting logical_block_size > physical_block_size in
the QEMU command line, and discovering that it confuses Windows VMs -
fsutil reports both physical and logical block sizes are equal to the
logical size.
Example QEMU option:
-device scsi-hd,drive=drive-scsi0,id=disk1,bus=scsi.0,
physical_block_size=512,logical_block_size=4096
Windows Server 2012 R2 VM:
C:\Users\Administrator>fsutil fsinfo ntfsinfo F:
...
Bytes Per Sector : 4096
Bytes Per Physical Sector : 4096
Bytes Per Cluster : 4096
Bytes Per FileRecord Segment : 4096
...
Signed-off-by: Mark Kanda <mark.kanda@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Martin K. Petersen <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
---
hw/scsi/scsi-disk.c | 8 ++++++++
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
diff --git a/hw/scsi/scsi-disk.c b/hw/scsi/scsi-disk.c
index 6e841fb..2a4f8c5 100644
--- a/hw/scsi/scsi-disk.c
+++ b/hw/scsi/scsi-disk.c
@@ -2329,6 +2329,14 @@ static void scsi_realize(SCSIDevice *dev, Error **errp)
blkconf_serial(&s->qdev.conf, &s->serial);
blkconf_blocksizes(&s->qdev.conf);
+
+ if (s->qdev.conf.logical_block_size >
+ s->qdev.conf.physical_block_size) {
+ error_setg(errp,
+ "logical_block_size > physical_block_size not supported");
+ return;
+ }
+
if (dev->type == TYPE_DISK) {
blkconf_geometry(&dev->conf, NULL, 65535, 255, 255, &err);
if (err) {
--
1.8.3.1
next reply other threads:[~2017-10-16 20:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-10-16 20:17 Mark Kanda [this message]
2017-10-18 9:53 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] Reject virtio-scsi configurations with logical block size > physical block size Paolo Bonzini
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1508185024-5840-1-git-send-email-mark.kanda@oracle.com \
--to=mark.kanda@oracle.com \
--cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).