From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:60067) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1e5AUX-0005Cm-Mk for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 19 Oct 2017 09:04:11 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1e5AUT-0003oD-PP for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 19 Oct 2017 09:04:05 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:45680) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1e5AUT-0003lZ-JK for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 19 Oct 2017 09:04:01 -0400 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx06.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.16]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B22B8C04AC5A for ; Thu, 19 Oct 2017 13:03:59 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <1508418225.18146.1.camel@redhat.com> From: Gerd Hoffmann Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2017 15:03:45 +0200 In-Reply-To: <9d4b1fa8-e670-556b-278d-4993ad41b512@redhat.com> References: <20171018095807.101406-1-marcel@redhat.com> <69cefa98-5681-5b12-719c-e13fcba969c4@redhat.com> <9d4b1fa8-e670-556b-278d-4993ad41b512@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] hw/pci-host: Fix x86 Host Bridges 64bit PCI hole List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Marcel Apfelbaum , Laszlo Ersek , qemu-devel@nongnu.org Cc: mst@redhat.com, pbonzini@redhat.com, ehabkost@redhat.com, Igor Mammedov , "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" Hi, > =C2=A0 - commit 39848901818 pc: limit 64 bit hole to 2G by default > =C2=A0 shows us QEMU had the 64bit PCI hole, so it is a regression. commit message says: =C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0It turns out that some 32 bit windows guests cras= h =C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0if 64 bit PCI hole size is >2G. Why this suddenly isn't a problem any more? Also: how about just using the existing pci_hole64_size property? cheers, Gerd