From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:41016) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1e5UY9-0006pU-FM for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 20 Oct 2017 06:29:10 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1e5UY4-0000eb-En for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 20 Oct 2017 06:29:09 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:39760) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1e5UY4-0000eQ-97 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 20 Oct 2017 06:29:04 -0400 Message-ID: <1508495342.18146.8.camel@redhat.com> From: Gerd Hoffmann Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2017 12:29:02 +0200 In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] SDL2 issues List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Michael Tokarev , qemu-devel qemu-devel On Fri, 2017-10-20 at 13:05 +0300, Michael Tokarev wrote: > Hello > > After we tried to switch from SDL1 to SDL2 in Debian qemu, > we receives quite some reports about various issues. > > We use 2.10.1 version of qemu. > > Example of the issues: http://bugs.debian.org/879193 Doesn't reproduce. > http://bugs.debian.org/870025 - a few patches at the bottom Those patches should go to the mailing list. > http://bugs.debian.org/878087 Yes, -k is simply not supported with sdl2. Those remappings should be done in the guest instead. > What's the status of SDL2 support in qemu? I've seen it is > the default now if SDL2 is present on the system (it was > SDL1 before). Yep. Long term I want drop SDL1, this is the first step. > Also, what's the status of SDL _audio_ support, is it needed > at all once we have alsa, pa and oss? Dunno how well mixing sdl display with non-sdl audio works. Feel free to send a patch dropping sdl audio to the list to check what people think about that ;) cheers, Gerd