qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Lieven <pl@kamp.de>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, qemu-block@nongnu.org
Cc: kwolf@redhat.com, mreitz@redhat.com, Peter Lieven <pl@kamp.de>
Subject: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH V4] qemu-img: align result of is_allocated_sectors
Date: Sat,  7 Jul 2018 13:42:03 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1530963723-14380-1-git-send-email-pl@kamp.de> (raw)

We currently don't enforce that the sparse segments we detect during convert are
aligned. This leads to unnecessary and costly read-modify-write cycles either
internally in Qemu or in the background on the storage device as nearly all
modern filesystems or hardware have a 4k alignment internally.

This patch modifies is_allocated_sectors so that its *pnum result will always
end at an alignment boundary. This way all requests will end at an alignment
boundary. The start of all requests will also be aligned as long as the results
of get_block_status do not lead to an unaligned offset.

The number of RMW cycles when converting an example image [1] to a raw device that
has 4k sector size is about 4600 4k read requests to perform a total of about 15000
write requests. With this path the additional 4600 read requests are eliminated while
the number of total write requests stays constant.

[1] https://cloud-images.ubuntu.com/releases/16.04/release/ubuntu-16.04-server-cloudimg-amd64-disk1.vmdk

Signed-off-by: Peter Lieven <pl@kamp.de>
---
V3->V4: - only focus on the end offset in is_allocated_sectors [Kevin]
V2->V3: - ensure that s.alignment is a power of 2
        - correctly handle n < alignment in is_allocated_sectors if
          sector_num % alignment > 0.
V1->V2: - take the current sector offset into account [Max]
        - try to figure out the target alignment [Max]

 qemu-img.c | 44 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
 1 file changed, 38 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/qemu-img.c b/qemu-img.c
index e1a506f..20e3236 100644
--- a/qemu-img.c
+++ b/qemu-img.c
@@ -1105,11 +1105,15 @@ static int64_t find_nonzero(const uint8_t *buf, int64_t n)
  *
  * 'pnum' is set to the number of sectors (including and immediately following
  * the first one) that are known to be in the same allocated/unallocated state.
+ * The function will try to align the end offset to alignment boundaries so
+ * that the request will at least end aligned and consequtive requests will
+ * also start at an aligned offset.
  */
-static int is_allocated_sectors(const uint8_t *buf, int n, int *pnum)
+static int is_allocated_sectors(const uint8_t *buf, int n, int *pnum,
+                                int64_t sector_num, int alignment)
 {
     bool is_zero;
-    int i;
+    int i, tail;
 
     if (n <= 0) {
         *pnum = 0;
@@ -1122,6 +1126,23 @@ static int is_allocated_sectors(const uint8_t *buf, int n, int *pnum)
             break;
         }
     }
+
+    tail = (sector_num + i) & (alignment - 1);
+    if (tail) {
+        if (is_zero && i == tail) {
+            /* treat unallocated areas which only consist
+             * of a small tail as allocated. */
+            is_zero = 0;
+        }
+        if (!is_zero) {
+            /* align up end offset of allocated areas. */
+            i += alignment - tail;
+            i = MIN(i, n);
+        } else {
+            /* align down end offset of zero areas. */
+            i -= tail;
+        }
+    }
     *pnum = i;
     return !is_zero;
 }
@@ -1132,7 +1153,7 @@ static int is_allocated_sectors(const uint8_t *buf, int n, int *pnum)
  * breaking up write requests for only small sparse areas.
  */
 static int is_allocated_sectors_min(const uint8_t *buf, int n, int *pnum,
-    int min)
+    int min, int64_t sector_num, int alignment)
 {
     int ret;
     int num_checked, num_used;
@@ -1141,7 +1162,7 @@ static int is_allocated_sectors_min(const uint8_t *buf, int n, int *pnum,
         min = n;
     }
 
-    ret = is_allocated_sectors(buf, n, pnum);
+    ret = is_allocated_sectors(buf, n, pnum, sector_num, alignment);
     if (!ret) {
         return ret;
     }
@@ -1149,13 +1170,15 @@ static int is_allocated_sectors_min(const uint8_t *buf, int n, int *pnum,
     num_used = *pnum;
     buf += BDRV_SECTOR_SIZE * *pnum;
     n -= *pnum;
+    sector_num += *pnum;
     num_checked = num_used;
 
     while (n > 0) {
-        ret = is_allocated_sectors(buf, n, pnum);
+        ret = is_allocated_sectors(buf, n, pnum, sector_num, alignment);
 
         buf += BDRV_SECTOR_SIZE * *pnum;
         n -= *pnum;
+        sector_num += *pnum;
         num_checked += *pnum;
         if (ret) {
             num_used = num_checked;
@@ -1560,6 +1583,7 @@ typedef struct ImgConvertState {
     bool wr_in_order;
     bool copy_range;
     int min_sparse;
+    int alignment;
     size_t cluster_sectors;
     size_t buf_sectors;
     long num_coroutines;
@@ -1724,7 +1748,8 @@ static int coroutine_fn convert_co_write(ImgConvertState *s, int64_t sector_num,
              * zeroed. */
             if (!s->min_sparse ||
                 (!s->compressed &&
-                 is_allocated_sectors_min(buf, n, &n, s->min_sparse)) ||
+                 is_allocated_sectors_min(buf, n, &n, s->min_sparse,
+                                          sector_num, s->alignment)) ||
                 (s->compressed &&
                  !buffer_is_zero(buf, n * BDRV_SECTOR_SIZE)))
             {
@@ -2373,6 +2398,13 @@ static int img_convert(int argc, char **argv)
                                 out_bs->bl.pdiscard_alignment >>
                                 BDRV_SECTOR_BITS)));
 
+    /* try to align the write requests to the destination to avoid unnecessary
+     * RMW cycles. */
+    s.alignment = MAX(pow2floor(s.min_sparse),
+                      DIV_ROUND_UP(out_bs->bl.request_alignment,
+                                   BDRV_SECTOR_SIZE));
+    assert(is_power_of_2(s.alignment));
+
     if (skip_create) {
         int64_t output_sectors = blk_nb_sectors(s.target);
         if (output_sectors < 0) {
-- 
2.7.4

             reply	other threads:[~2018-07-07 11:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-07-07 11:42 Peter Lieven [this message]
2018-07-10 12:28 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH V4] qemu-img: align result of is_allocated_sectors Kevin Wolf
2018-07-10 12:36   ` Peter Lieven
2018-07-10 13:06     ` Kevin Wolf

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1530963723-14380-1-git-send-email-pl@kamp.de \
    --to=pl@kamp.de \
    --cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
    --cc=mreitz@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-block@nongnu.org \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).