From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:60364)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <pmoore@redhat.com>) id 1UwvQN-0003yD-HI
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 10 Jul 2013 10:31:24 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <pmoore@redhat.com>) id 1UwvQI-0002dV-Vk
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 10 Jul 2013 10:31:19 -0400
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:19053)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <pmoore@redhat.com>) id 1UwvQI-0002dD-P4
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 10 Jul 2013 10:31:14 -0400
From: Paul Moore <pmoore@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2013 10:31:07 -0400
Message-ID: <1536749.nyBeeYseQi@sifl>
In-Reply-To: <20130529203001.20939.83322.stgit@localhost>
References: <20130529203001.20939.83322.stgit@localhost>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] seccomp: add the asynchronous I/O syscalls
	to the whitelist
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: coreyb@linux.vnet.ibm.com, otubo@linux.vnet.ibm.com

On Wednesday, May 29, 2013 04:30:01 PM Paul Moore wrote:
> In order to enable the asynchronous I/O functionality when using the
> seccomp sandbox we need to add the associated syscalls to the
> whitelist.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Paul Moore <pmoore@redhat.com>
> ---
>  qemu-seccomp.c |    5 ++++-
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/qemu-seccomp.c b/qemu-seccomp.c
> index 031da1d..ca123bf 100644
> --- a/qemu-seccomp.c
> +++ b/qemu-seccomp.c
> @@ -87,6 +87,7 @@ static const struct QemuSeccompSyscall seccomp_whitelist[]
> = { { SCMP_SYS(stat), 245 },
>      { SCMP_SYS(uname), 245 },
>      { SCMP_SYS(eventfd2), 245 },
> +    { SCMP_SYS(io_getevents), 245 },
>      { SCMP_SYS(dup), 245 },
>      { SCMP_SYS(dup2), 245 },
>      { SCMP_SYS(dup3), 245 },
> @@ -229,7 +230,9 @@ static const struct QemuSeccompSyscall
> seccomp_whitelist[] = { { SCMP_SYS(sendmmsg), 241 },
>      { SCMP_SYS(recvmmsg), 241 },
>      { SCMP_SYS(prlimit64), 241 },
> -    { SCMP_SYS(waitid), 241 }
> +    { SCMP_SYS(waitid), 241 },
> +    { SCMP_SYS(io_setup), 241 },
> +    { SCMP_SYS(io_destroy), 241 }
>  };
> 
>  int seccomp_start(void)

Any reason this patch wasn't pulled in for 1.5.1?

-- 
paul moore
security and virtualization @ redhat