* [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] file-posix: Check effective size in truncate operation
@ 2018-11-26 3:57 zhenwei pi
2019-01-14 10:46 ` Max Reitz
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: zhenwei pi @ 2018-11-26 3:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: kwolf, mreitz; +Cc: pizhenwei, qemu-block, qemu-devel
Function raw_co_truncate does not check effective size for BLK device file,
and QEMU may notify guest without any size changing.
Two cases can be reproduced easily by qmp command:
CASE 1:
1, create a logical volume(12M) by LVM, and guest uses this volume as "vdb"
2, run qmp command : virsh qemu-monitor-command INSTANCE '{"execute":
"block_resize", "arguments":{"device":"drive-virtio-disk1","size":12582912}}'
The effective size(12M) is equal to the argument(12M) and the real device file
size(12M). QEMU should ignore this command and has no need to notify guest.
CASE 2:
1, create a logical volume(12M) by LVM, and guest uses this volume as "vdb"
2, resize LV to 16M by lvresize command
3, run qmp command : virsh qemu-monitor-command INSTANCE '{"execute":
"block_resize", "arguments":{"device":"drive-virtio-disk1","size":10485760}}'
The device file size actually grew, but the argument(10M) is less than the
effective size(12M). This command should fail, but QEMU still report success.
Signed-off-by: zhenwei pi <pizhenwei@bytedance.com>
---
block/file-posix.c | 15 +++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 15 insertions(+)
diff --git a/block/file-posix.c b/block/file-posix.c
index 07bbdab953..951d910b0b 100644
--- a/block/file-posix.c
+++ b/block/file-posix.c
@@ -1991,6 +1991,7 @@ static int coroutine_fn raw_co_truncate(BlockDriverState *bs, int64_t offset,
BDRVRawState *s = bs->opaque;
struct stat st;
int ret;
+ int64_t sectors;
if (fstat(s->fd, &st)) {
ret = -errno;
@@ -2013,6 +2014,20 @@ static int coroutine_fn raw_co_truncate(BlockDriverState *bs, int64_t offset,
error_setg(errp, "Cannot grow device files");
return -EINVAL;
}
+
+ sectors = raw_getlength(bs) >> BDRV_SECTOR_BITS;
+ if (sectors > bs->total_sectors) {
+ /* device size actually grew */
+ if (offset <= bs->total_sectors * BDRV_SECTOR_SIZE) {
+ error_setg(errp, "The effective size of this device is "
+ "greater than or equal to the argument");
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
+ } else if (sectors == bs->total_sectors) {
+ /* device size actually not changed */
+ error_setg(errp, "Detect device file size not changing");
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
} else {
error_setg(errp, "Resizing this file is not supported");
return -ENOTSUP;
--
2.11.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] file-posix: Check effective size in truncate operation
2018-11-26 3:57 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] file-posix: Check effective size in truncate operation zhenwei pi
@ 2019-01-14 10:46 ` Max Reitz
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Max Reitz @ 2019-01-14 10:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: zhenwei pi, kwolf; +Cc: qemu-block, qemu-devel
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1747 bytes --]
On 26.11.18 04:57, zhenwei pi wrote:
> Function raw_co_truncate does not check effective size for BLK device file,
> and QEMU may notify guest without any size changing.
>
> Two cases can be reproduced easily by qmp command:
> CASE 1:
> 1, create a logical volume(12M) by LVM, and guest uses this volume as "vdb"
> 2, run qmp command : virsh qemu-monitor-command INSTANCE '{"execute":
> "block_resize", "arguments":{"device":"drive-virtio-disk1","size":12582912}}'
>
> The effective size(12M) is equal to the argument(12M) and the real device file
> size(12M). QEMU should ignore this command and has no need to notify guest.
I don't quite see the issue here. The command is valid, why would it be
an error? And I don't see the harm in notifying the guest either.
> CASE 2:
> 1, create a logical volume(12M) by LVM, and guest uses this volume as "vdb"
> 2, resize LV to 16M by lvresize command
> 3, run qmp command : virsh qemu-monitor-command INSTANCE '{"execute":
> "block_resize", "arguments":{"device":"drive-virtio-disk1","size":10485760}}'
>
> The device file size actually grew, but the argument(10M) is less than the
> effective size(12M). This command should fail, but QEMU still report success.
Nor do I see a real problem here. It isn't dangerous if qemu trusts the
user, but it may break existing use cases to error out if the user
specifies a length that's too short.
In fact, I would suppose if you want to shrink an LVM volume, the
correct way to do it is to first shrink the virtual device in qemu (with
block_resize), and only then shrink the physical device on the host;
otherwise, qemu might issue requests beyond the end of the physical
disk. This change would break that.
Max
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2019-01-14 10:56 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2018-11-26 3:57 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] file-posix: Check effective size in truncate operation zhenwei pi
2019-01-14 10:46 ` Max Reitz
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).