From: Paul Durrant <paul.durrant@citrix.com>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, qemu-block@nongnu.org,
xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
Cc: Tim Smith <tim.smith@citrix.com>,
Paul Durrant <paul.durrant@citrix.com>,
Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>,
Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org>,
Anthony Perard <anthony.perard@citrix.com>,
Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>, Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>
Subject: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 1/3] xen-block: improve batching behaviour
Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2018 11:16:24 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1544613386-22045-2-git-send-email-paul.durrant@citrix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1544613386-22045-1-git-send-email-paul.durrant@citrix.com>
From: Tim Smith <tim.smith@citrix.com>
When I/O consists of many small requests, performance is improved by
batching them together in a single io_submit() call. When there are
relatively few requests, the extra overhead is not worth it. This
introduces a check to start batching I/O requests via blk_io_plug()/
blk_io_unplug() in an amount proportional to the number which were
already in flight at the time we started reading the ring.
Signed-off-by: Tim Smith <tim.smith@citrix.com>
Re-based and commit comment adjusted.
Signed-off-by: Paul Durrant <paul.durrant@citrix.com>
---
Cc: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
Cc: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org>
Cc: Anthony Perard <anthony.perard@citrix.com>
Cc: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Cc: Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>
---
hw/block/dataplane/xen-block.c | 35 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 35 insertions(+)
diff --git a/hw/block/dataplane/xen-block.c b/hw/block/dataplane/xen-block.c
index 80df7da..db17ab5 100644
--- a/hw/block/dataplane/xen-block.c
+++ b/hw/block/dataplane/xen-block.c
@@ -528,10 +528,18 @@ static int xen_block_get_request(XenBlockDataPlane *dataplane,
return 0;
}
+/*
+ * Threshold of in-flight requests above which we will start using
+ * blk_io_plug()/blk_io_unplug() to batch requests.
+ */
+#define IO_PLUG_THRESHOLD 1
+
static void xen_block_handle_requests(XenBlockDataPlane *dataplane)
{
RING_IDX rc, rp;
XenBlockRequest *request;
+ int inflight_atstart = dataplane->requests_inflight;
+ int batched = 0;
dataplane->more_work = 0;
@@ -540,6 +548,18 @@ static void xen_block_handle_requests(XenBlockDataPlane *dataplane)
xen_rmb(); /* Ensure we see queued requests up to 'rp'. */
xen_block_send_response_all(dataplane);
+ /*
+ * If there was more than IO_PLUG_THRESHOLD requests in flight
+ * when we got here, this is an indication that there the bottleneck
+ * is below us, so it's worth beginning to batch up I/O requests
+ * rather than submitting them immediately. The maximum number
+ * of requests we're willing to batch is the number already in
+ * flight, so it can grow up to max_requests when the bottleneck
+ * is below us.
+ */
+ if (inflight_atstart > IO_PLUG_THRESHOLD) {
+ blk_io_plug(dataplane->blk);
+ }
while (rc != rp) {
/* pull request from ring */
if (RING_REQUEST_CONS_OVERFLOW(&dataplane->rings.common, rc)) {
@@ -585,7 +605,22 @@ static void xen_block_handle_requests(XenBlockDataPlane *dataplane)
continue;
}
+ if (inflight_atstart > IO_PLUG_THRESHOLD &&
+ batched >= inflight_atstart) {
+ blk_io_unplug(dataplane->blk);
+ }
xen_block_do_aio(request);
+ if (inflight_atstart > IO_PLUG_THRESHOLD) {
+ if (batched >= inflight_atstart) {
+ blk_io_plug(dataplane->blk);
+ batched = 0;
+ } else {
+ batched++;
+ }
+ }
+ }
+ if (inflight_atstart > IO_PLUG_THRESHOLD) {
+ blk_io_unplug(dataplane->blk);
}
if (dataplane->more_work &&
--
2.1.4
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-12-12 11:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-12-12 11:16 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 0/3] Performance improvements for xen_disk^Wxen-block Paul Durrant
2018-12-12 11:16 ` Paul Durrant [this message]
2018-12-12 11:16 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 2/3] xen-block: improve response latency Paul Durrant
2018-12-12 11:16 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 3/3] xen-block: avoid repeated memory allocation Paul Durrant
2018-12-13 12:24 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 0/3] Performance improvements for xen_disk^Wxen-block Anthony PERARD
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1544613386-22045-2-git-send-email-paul.durrant@citrix.com \
--to=paul.durrant@citrix.com \
--cc=anthony.perard@citrix.com \
--cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
--cc=mreitz@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-block@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=sstabellini@kernel.org \
--cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
--cc=tim.smith@citrix.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).