From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:48985) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TGtJw-0005R3-Vm for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 26 Sep 2012 11:14:41 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TGtJs-0002SM-GE for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 26 Sep 2012 11:14:40 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:42828) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TGtJs-0002SA-8L for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 26 Sep 2012 11:14:36 -0400 From: Paul Moore Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2012 11:14:29 -0400 Message-ID: <1559484.FIy5X4RP1O@sifl> In-Reply-To: <1348174859-24809-1-git-send-email-otubo@linux.vnet.ibm.com> References: <1348174859-24809-1-git-send-email-otubo@linux.vnet.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] New syscalls to the seccomp whitelist List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Eduardo Otubo Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org On Thursday, September 20, 2012 06:00:59 PM Eduardo Otubo wrote: > Seccomp syscall whitelist updated after tests running qemu under > libvirt ... Hi Eduardo, I know from our discussions offlist that you have an additional debugging patch to help identify missing syscalls, perhaps you could also submit that patch too? I think we would want the debugging patch #ifdef'd out in normal use, but I think it might help the QEMU developers. -- paul moore security and virtualization @ redhat