qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Wainer dos Santos Moschetta <wainersm@redhat.com>
To: "Philippe Mathieu-Daudé" <philmd@redhat.com>,
	"Liam Merwick" <liam.merwick@oracle.com>,
	alex.bennee@linaro.org, fam@euphon.net
Cc: pbonzini@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, slp@redhat.com,
	sgarzare@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] tests/boot_linux_console: add microvm acceptance test
Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2020 16:10:21 -0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1559491d-d8e1-8099-64b0-ec0a33d0faf1@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <acf418d0-a002-4ae0-06cc-c26bf495f3f8@redhat.com>


On 1/30/20 9:51 PM, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> On 1/30/20 6:41 PM, Wainer dos Santos Moschetta wrote:
>> On 1/27/20 2:36 PM, Liam Merwick wrote:
>>> Refactor test_x86_64_pc() to test_x86_64_machine() so that separate
>>> functions which specify the Avocado tag of ':avocado: tags=machine:'
>>> as being either 'pc' or 'microvm' can be used to test booting a
>>> compressed kernel using either machine class.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Liam Merwick <liam.merwick@oracle.com>
>>> ---
>>>   tests/acceptance/boot_linux_console.py | 15 +++++++++++++--
>>>   1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/tests/acceptance/boot_linux_console.py 
>>> b/tests/acceptance/boot_linux_console.py
>>> index e40b84651b0b..aa5b07b1c609 100644
>>> --- a/tests/acceptance/boot_linux_console.py
>>> +++ b/tests/acceptance/boot_linux_console.py
>>> @@ -51,10 +51,9 @@ class BootLinuxConsole(Test):
>>>           os.chdir(cwd)
>>>           return self.workdir + path
>>> -    def test_x86_64_pc(self):
>>> +    def do_test_x86_64_machine(self):
>>>           """
>>>           :avocado: tags=arch:x86_64
>>> -        :avocado: tags=machine:pc
>>>           """
>>>           kernel_url = 
>>> ('https://archives.fedoraproject.org/pub/archive/fedora'
>>> '/linux/releases/29/Everything/x86_64/os/images/pxeboot'
>>> @@ -70,6 +69,18 @@ class BootLinuxConsole(Test):
>>>           console_pattern = 'Kernel command line: %s' % 
>>> kernel_command_line
>>>           self.wait_for_console_pattern(console_pattern)
>>> +    def test_x86_64_pc(self):
>>> +        """
>>> +        :avocado: tags=machine:pc
>>> +        """
>>
>> The test method won't inherit the 'arch' tag from 
>> `do_test_x86_64_machine()`, so you need to explicitly 'arch' tag each 
>> test you created in this series. If you don't do so, Avocado won't 
>> filter out those x86_64 tests in case QEMU is built with non-x86_64 
>> targets.
>>
>> Follows an example, I built QEMU with '--target-list=arm-softmmu'. I 
>> got:
>>
>> ```
>>
>> (02/18) 
>> tests/acceptance/boot_linux_console.py:BootLinuxConsole.test_x86_64_pc: 
>> CANCEL: No QEMU binary defined or found in the source tree (0.00 s)
>>   (03/18) 
>> tests/acceptance/boot_linux_console.py:BootLinuxConsole.test_x86_64_microvm: 
>> CANCEL: No QEMU binary defined or found in the source tree (0.00 s)
>>   (04/18) 
>> tests/acceptance/boot_linux_console.py:BootLinuxConsole.test_arm_virt: 
>> PASS (1.25 s)
>>
>> ```
>>
>> OK, avocado_qemu was smart enough to skip the tests, but ideally it 
>> should not even consider running them in the first place.
>
> This should be solved by this patch:
> https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2020-01/msg07311.html
> "tests/acceptance: Use 'machine' tag to check if available in QEMU binary"


That patch is useful**  but does not solve the problem that I point out 
here. If you have a test case which is arch-specific and the arch-QEMU 
was not built then it should not be executed. Tagging the test with 
'arch' ensures that.

** BTW, I'm going to review it soon

- Wainer


>>
>> Thanks!
>>
>> - Wainer
>>
>>> +        self.do_test_x86_64_machine()
>>> +
>>> +    def test_x86_64_microvm(self):
>>> +        """
>>> +        :avocado: tags=machine:microvm
>>> +        """
>>> +        self.do_test_x86_64_machine()
>>> +
>>>       def test_mips_malta(self):
>>>           """
>>>           :avocado: tags=arch:mips
>>
>
>



  reply	other threads:[~2020-01-31 18:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-01-27 16:36 [PATCH 0/6] tests/boot_linux_console: add extra boot acceptance tests Liam Merwick
2020-01-27 16:36 ` [PATCH 1/6] tests/boot_linux_console: add microvm acceptance test Liam Merwick
2020-01-30 11:49   ` Stefano Garzarella
2020-01-30 17:41   ` Wainer dos Santos Moschetta
2020-01-30 23:51     ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2020-01-31 18:10       ` Wainer dos Santos Moschetta [this message]
2020-01-27 16:36 ` [PATCH 2/6] tests/boot_linux_console: add BIOS " Liam Merwick
2020-01-30 11:27   ` Stefano Garzarella
2020-01-30 15:34     ` Liam Merwick
2020-01-30 16:28       ` Liam Merwick
2020-01-30 16:45         ` Stefano Garzarella
2020-01-27 16:36 ` [PATCH 3/6] tests/boot_linux_console: fix extract_from_deb() comment Liam Merwick
2020-01-30 11:29   ` Stefano Garzarella
2020-01-30 18:17   ` Wainer dos Santos Moschetta
2020-01-31  0:03   ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2020-01-27 16:36 ` [PATCH 4/6] travis.yml: install rpm2cpio for acceptance tests Liam Merwick
2020-01-30 12:00   ` Stefano Garzarella
2020-01-27 16:36 ` [PATCH 5/6] tests/boot_linux_console: add extract_from_rpm method Liam Merwick
2020-01-30 12:05   ` Stefano Garzarella
2020-01-30 15:34     ` Liam Merwick
2020-01-30 19:19       ` Wainer dos Santos Moschetta
2020-01-30 23:59         ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2020-01-31 15:02         ` Liam Merwick
2020-02-04 13:31           ` Liam Merwick
2020-02-04 14:22             ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2020-01-27 16:36 ` [PATCH 6/6] tests/boot_linux_console: add PVH acceptance tests Liam Merwick
2020-01-30 12:08   ` Stefano Garzarella
2020-01-30 23:57   ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2020-01-31 15:03     ` Liam Merwick
2020-01-31 15:18       ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2020-01-30 17:57 ` [PATCH 0/6] tests/boot_linux_console: add extra boot " Wainer dos Santos Moschetta

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1559491d-d8e1-8099-64b0-ec0a33d0faf1@redhat.com \
    --to=wainersm@redhat.com \
    --cc=alex.bennee@linaro.org \
    --cc=fam@euphon.net \
    --cc=liam.merwick@oracle.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=philmd@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=sgarzare@redhat.com \
    --cc=slp@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).