From: Raphael Norwitz <raphael.norwitz@nutanix.com>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, mst@redhat.com
Cc: raphael.s.norwitz@gmail.com,
Raphael Norwitz <raphael.norwitz@nutanix.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 0/3] vhost-user: Lift Max Ram Slots Limitation
Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2020 21:57:03 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1579143426-18305-1-git-send-email-raphael.norwitz@nutanix.com> (raw)
In QEMU today, a VM with a vhost-user device can hot add memory a
maximum of 8 times. See these threads, among others:
[1] https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2019-07/msg01046.html
https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2019-07/msg01236.html
[2] https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2017-11/msg04656.html
This series introduces a new protocol feature
VHOST_USER_PROTOCOL_F_CONFIGURE_SLOTS which, when enabled, lifts the
restriction on the maximum number RAM slots imposed by vhost-user.
The patch consists of 3 changes:
1. Fixed assert in vhost_user_set_mem_table_postcopy:
This is a bug fix in the postcopy migration path
2. Refactor vhost_user_set_mem_table functions:
This is a non-functional change refractoring the
vhost_user_set_mem_table and vhost_user_set_mem_table_postcopy
functions such that the feature can be more cleanly added.
3. Lift max memory slots limit imposed by vhost-user:
This change introduces the new protocol feature
VHOST_USER_PROTOCOL_F_CONFIGURE_SLOTS.
The implementation details are explained in more detail in the commit
messages, but at a high level the new protocol feature works as follows:
- If the VHOST_USER_PROTCOL_F_CONFIGURE_SLOTS feature is enabled, QEMU will
send multiple VHOST_USER_ADD_MEM_REG and VHOST_USER_REM_MEM_REG
messages to map and unmap individual memory regions instead of one large
VHOST_USER_SET_MEM_TABLE message containing all memory regions.
- The vhost-user struct maintains a ’shadow state’ of memory regions
already sent to the guest. Each time vhost_user_set_mem_table is called,
the shadow state is compared with the new device state. A
VHOST_USER_REM_MEM_REG will be sent for each region in the shadow state
not in the device state. Then, a VHOST_USER_ADD_MEM_REG will be sent
for each region in the device state but not the shadow state. After
these messages have been sent, the shadow state will be updated to
reflect the new device state.
The VHOST_USER_SET_MEM_TABLE message was not reused because as the number of
regions grows, the message becomes very large. In practice, such large
messages caused problems (truncated messages) and in the past it seems the
community has opted for smaller fixed size messages where possible. VRINGs,
for example, are sent to the backend individually instead of in one massive
message.
Current Limitations:
- postcopy migration is not supported when the
VHOST_USER_PROTOCOL_F_CONFIGURE_SLOTS has been negotiated.
- VHOST_USER_PROTOCOL_F_CONFIGURE_SLOTS cannot be negotiated when
VHOST_USER_PROTOCOL_F_REPLY_ACK has also been negotiated.
Both of these limitations are due to resource contraints. They are not
imposed for technical reasons.
Changes since V1:
* Kept the assert in vhost_user_set_mem_table_postcopy, but moved it
to prevent corruption
* Made QEMU send a single VHOST_USER_GET_MAX_MEMSLOTS message at
startup and cache the returned value so that QEMU does not need to
query the backend every time vhost_backend_memslots_limit is called.
Best,
Raphael
Raphael Norwitz (3):
Fixed assert in vhost_user_set_mem_table_postcopy
Refactor vhost_user_set_mem_table functions
Lift max memory slots limit imposed by vhost-user
docs/interop/vhost-user.rst | 43 +++++
hw/virtio/vhost-user.c | 385 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
2 files changed, 336 insertions(+), 92 deletions(-)
--
1.8.3.1
next reply other threads:[~2020-01-28 6:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-01-16 2:57 Raphael Norwitz [this message]
2020-01-16 2:57 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] Fixed assert in vhost_user_set_mem_table_postcopy Raphael Norwitz
2020-02-06 8:17 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2020-02-06 8:20 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2020-02-09 17:17 ` Raphael Norwitz
2020-01-16 2:57 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] Refactor vhost_user_set_mem_table functions Raphael Norwitz
2020-02-06 8:21 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2020-02-09 17:21 ` Raphael Norwitz
2020-01-16 2:57 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] Lift max memory slots limit imposed by vhost-user Raphael Norwitz
2020-02-06 8:32 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2020-02-09 17:43 ` Raphael Norwitz
2020-02-20 7:03 ` Raphael Norwitz
2020-02-25 12:07 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2020-01-31 21:21 ` [PATCH v2 0/3] vhost-user: Lift Max Ram Slots Limitation Raphael Norwitz
2020-02-06 8:33 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2020-02-09 17:14 ` Raphael Norwitz
2020-02-10 16:04 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2020-02-19 5:33 ` Raphael Norwitz
2020-02-19 10:08 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1579143426-18305-1-git-send-email-raphael.norwitz@nutanix.com \
--to=raphael.norwitz@nutanix.com \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=raphael.s.norwitz@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).