From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:60476) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cYhpU-00048n-As for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 31 Jan 2017 18:27:17 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cYhpT-0001eP-Iw for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 31 Jan 2017 18:27:16 -0500 Sender: Paolo Bonzini From: Paolo Bonzini References: <1485879287-12548-1-git-send-email-peter.maydell@linaro.org> <87wpdbw2ki.fsf@dusky.pond.sub.org> Message-ID: <157b55c5-2927-5f4e-0c43-820abd75a6d2@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2017 18:27:10 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <87wpdbw2ki.fsf@dusky.pond.sub.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] Drop QEMU_GNUC_PREREQ() checks for gcc older than 4.1 List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Markus Armbruster , Peter Maydell Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, qemu-trivial@nongnu.org, patches@linaro.org On 31/01/2017 12:40, Markus Armbruster wrote: >> >> #define QEMU_NORETURN __attribute__ ((__noreturn__)) >> >> -#if QEMU_GNUC_PREREQ(3, 4) >> #define QEMU_WARN_UNUSED_RESULT __attribute__((warn_unused_result)) >> -#else >> -#define QEMU_WARN_UNUSED_RESULT >> -#endif > Should we inline this macro? > >> >> -#if QEMU_GNUC_PREREQ(4, 0) >> #define QEMU_SENTINEL __attribute__((sentinel)) >> -#else >> -#define QEMU_SENTINEL >> -#endif > Likewise. Why, since we don't do that for QEMU_NORETURN, QEMU_PACKED, etc.? Paolo