qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
To: Shalini Chellathurai Saroja <shalini@linux.ibm.com>,
	qemu-s390x mailing list <qemu-s390x@nongnu.org>,
	Daniel Berrange <berrange@redhat.com>
Cc: qemu-devel mailing list <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>,
	Nina Schoetterl-Glausch <nsg@linux.ibm.com>,
	Hendrik Brueckner <brueckner@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 4/4] hw/s390x: compat handling for backward migration
Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2025 09:52:53 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1584a6d0-63b8-459b-9f4b-84192a9256e1@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250331140041.3133621-5-shalini@linux.ibm.com>

On 31/03/2025 16.00, Shalini Chellathurai Saroja wrote:
> Add Control-Program Identification (CPI) device to QOM only when the virtual
> machine supports CPI. CPI is supported from "s390-ccw-virtio-10.0" machine
> and higher.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Shalini Chellathurai Saroja <shalini@linux.ibm.com>
> ---
>   hw/s390x/event-facility.c  | 27 ++++++++++++++++++++++-----
>   hw/s390x/s390-virtio-ccw.c |  1 +
>   2 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/hw/s390x/event-facility.c b/hw/s390x/event-facility.c
> index c0fb6e098c..cb23bbc54b 100644
> --- a/hw/s390x/event-facility.c
> +++ b/hw/s390x/event-facility.c
> @@ -22,6 +22,7 @@
>   #include "hw/s390x/sclp.h"
>   #include "migration/vmstate.h"
>   #include "hw/s390x/event-facility.h"
> +#include "hw/qdev-properties.h"
>   
>   typedef struct SCLPEventsBus {
>       BusState qbus;
> @@ -54,6 +55,7 @@ struct SCLPEventFacility {
>       bool allow_all_mask_sizes;
>       /* length of the receive mask */
>       uint16_t mask_length;
> +    bool use_cpi;
>   };
>   
>   /* return true if any child has event pending set */
> @@ -455,11 +457,20 @@ static void realize_event_facility(DeviceState *dev, Error **errp)
>           qdev_unrealize(DEVICE(&event_facility->quiesce));
>           return;
>       }
> -    if (!qdev_realize(DEVICE(&event_facility->cpi),
> -                      BUS(&event_facility->sbus), errp)) {
> -        qdev_unrealize(DEVICE(&event_facility->quiesce));
> -        qdev_unrealize(DEVICE(&event_facility->cpu_hotplug));
> -        return;
> +    /*
> +     * Add sclpcpi device to QOM only when the virtual machine supports
> +     * Control-Program Identification. It is supported by "s390-ccw-virtio-10.0"
> +     * machine and higher.
> +     */
> +    if (!event_facility->use_cpi) {
> +        object_unparent(OBJECT(&event_facility->cpi));
> +    } else {
> +        if (!qdev_realize(DEVICE(&event_facility->cpi),
> +                          BUS(&event_facility->sbus), errp)) {
> +            qdev_unrealize(DEVICE(&event_facility->quiesce));
> +            qdev_unrealize(DEVICE(&event_facility->cpu_hotplug));
> +            return;
> +        }

Hmm, first doing object_initialize_child() in init_event_facility() and then 
unparenting it here again in case we are running with an older machine type 
is a little bit ugly. I wonder whether it would be nicer to add the QOM 
object from ccw_init() init instead, similar to what we do with the 
SCLP-console in s390_create_sclpconsole() ? If you've got some spare 
minutes, could you please give it a try whether that looks nicer?

  Thanks,
   Thomas



  reply	other threads:[~2025-04-02  7:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-03-31 14:00 [PATCH v3 0/4] *** Add SCLP event type CPI *** Shalini Chellathurai Saroja
2025-03-31 14:00 ` [PATCH v3 1/4] hw/s390x: add SCLP event type CPI Shalini Chellathurai Saroja
2025-04-02  5:48   ` Thomas Huth
2025-04-02  7:54     ` Shalini Chellathurai Saroja
2025-03-31 14:00 ` [PATCH v3 2/4] hw/s390x: add Control-Program Identification to QOM Shalini Chellathurai Saroja
2025-04-01 13:55   ` Nina Schoetterl-Glausch
2025-04-02  5:58   ` Thomas Huth
2025-03-31 14:00 ` [PATCH v3 3/4] hw/s390x: support migration of CPI data Shalini Chellathurai Saroja
2025-04-02  6:05   ` Thomas Huth
2025-04-02  9:12     ` Shalini Chellathurai Saroja
2025-03-31 14:00 ` [PATCH v3 4/4] hw/s390x: compat handling for backward migration Shalini Chellathurai Saroja
2025-04-02  7:52   ` Thomas Huth [this message]
2025-04-03 12:49     ` Shalini Chellathurai Saroja
2025-04-09  5:49       ` Thomas Huth
2025-04-09 14:13         ` Shalini Chellathurai Saroja

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1584a6d0-63b8-459b-9f4b-84192a9256e1@redhat.com \
    --to=thuth@redhat.com \
    --cc=berrange@redhat.com \
    --cc=brueckner@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=nsg@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=qemu-s390x@nongnu.org \
    --cc=shalini@linux.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).