From: Auger Eric <eric.auger@redhat.com>
To: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Cc: Eric Auger <eric.auger.pro@gmail.com>,
QEMU Developers <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>,
qemu-arm <qemu-arm@nongnu.org>,
Prem Mallappa <prem.mallappa@gmail.com>,
Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>,
Tomasz Nowicki <tn@semihalf.com>,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
Christoffer Dall <cdall@kernel.org>,
Bharat Bhushan <bharat.bhushan@nxp.com>,
Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe.brucker@arm.com>,
linuc.decode@gmail.com, Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>,
Jintack Lim <jintack@cs.columbia.edu>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v11 16/17] hw/arm/smmuv3: IOTLB emulation
Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2018 16:48:29 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1587be11-1064-7f76-12d0-0441f61e6a03@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAFEAcA_rRaSncAH0op_vjN9zeypmhjERy3DWkSX-y_zKB=i3SQ@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Peter,
On 04/17/2018 02:55 PM, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 12 April 2018 at 08:38, Eric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com> wrote:
>> We emulate a TLB cache of size SMMU_IOTLB_MAX_SIZE=256.
>> It is implemented as a hash table whose key is a combination
>> of the 16b asid and 48b IOVA.
>>
>> Entries are invalidated on TLB invalidation commands, either
>> globally, or per asid, or per asid/iova.
>>
>> One peculiarity is the NH_VA invalidation command does not
>> convey any information about the size to be invalidated (as
>> opposed to what Intel does, for instance, with the am field).
>> Hence, when NH_VA arrives we both invalidate the 4K and 64K
>> entries, the both granules that we support.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Eric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com>
>>
>> ---
>>
>> Credit to Tomasz Nowicki who did the first implementation of
>> this IOTLB implementation, inspired of intel_iommu implemtation.
>> ---
>> hw/arm/smmu-common.c | 33 ++++++++++++++
>> hw/arm/smmuv3.c | 105 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
>> hw/arm/trace-events | 9 ++++
>> include/hw/arm/smmu-common.h | 11 +++++
>> 4 files changed, 154 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/hw/arm/smmu-common.c b/hw/arm/smmu-common.c
>> index c271a28..3d25339 100644
>> --- a/hw/arm/smmu-common.c
>> +++ b/hw/arm/smmu-common.c
>> @@ -29,6 +29,36 @@
>> #include "hw/arm/smmu-common.h"
>> #include "smmu-internal.h"
>>
>> +/* IOTLB Management */
>> +
>> +inline void smmu_iotlb_inv_all(SMMUState *s)
>> +{
>> + trace_smmu_iotlb_inv_all();
>> + g_hash_table_remove_all(s->iotlb);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static gboolean smmu_hash_remove_by_asid(gpointer key, gpointer value,
>> + gpointer user_data)
>> +{
>> + uint16_t asid = *(uint16_t *)user_data;
>> +
>> + return ((*(uint64_t *)key) >> IOTLB_KEY_ASID_SHIFT) == asid;
>> +}
>> +
>> +inline void smmu_iotlb_inv_iova(SMMUState *s, uint16_t asid, dma_addr_t iova)
>> +{
>> + uint64_t key = SMMU_IOTLB_KEY(asid, iova);
>> +
>> + trace_smmu_iotlb_inv_iova(asid, iova);
>> + g_hash_table_remove(s->iotlb, &key);
>> +}
>> +
>> +inline void smmu_iotlb_inv_asid(SMMUState *s, uint16_t asid)
>> +{
>> + trace_smmu_iotlb_inv_asid(asid);
>> + g_hash_table_foreach_remove(s->iotlb, smmu_hash_remove_by_asid, &asid);
>> +}
>> +
>> /* VMSAv8-64 Translation */
>>
>> /**
>> @@ -327,6 +357,8 @@ static void smmu_base_realize(DeviceState *dev, Error **errp)
>> return;
>> }
>> s->configs = g_hash_table_new_full(NULL, NULL, NULL, g_free);
>> + s->iotlb = g_hash_table_new_full(g_int64_hash, g_int64_equal,
>> + g_free, g_free);
>> s->smmu_pcibus_by_busptr = g_hash_table_new(NULL, NULL);
>>
>> if (s->primary_bus) {
>> @@ -341,6 +373,7 @@ static void smmu_base_reset(DeviceState *dev)
>> SMMUState *s = ARM_SMMU(dev);
>>
>> g_hash_table_remove_all(s->configs);
>> + g_hash_table_remove_all(s->iotlb);
>> }
>>
>> static Property smmu_dev_properties[] = {
>> diff --git a/hw/arm/smmuv3.c b/hw/arm/smmuv3.c
>> index 938052e..081f0fb 100644
>> --- a/hw/arm/smmuv3.c
>> +++ b/hw/arm/smmuv3.c
>> @@ -551,6 +551,8 @@ static SMMUTransCfg *smmuv3_get_config(SMMUDevice *sdev, SMMUEventInfo *event)
>> sdev->devfn);
>> cfg = g_new0(SMMUTransCfg, 1);
>> g_hash_table_insert(bc->configs, sdev, cfg);
>> + cfg->iotlb_miss = 0;
>> + cfg->iotlb_hit = 0;
>>
>> if (smmuv3_decode_config(&sdev->iommu, cfg, event)) {
>> g_hash_table_remove(bc->configs, sdev);
>> @@ -575,8 +577,12 @@ static IOMMUTLBEntry smmuv3_translate(IOMMUMemoryRegion *mr, hwaddr addr,
>> SMMUDevice *sdev = container_of(mr, SMMUDevice, iommu);
>> SMMUv3State *s = sdev->smmu;
>> uint32_t sid = smmu_get_sid(sdev);
>> + SMMUState *bs = ARM_SMMU(s);
>> SMMUEventInfo event = {.type = SMMU_EVT_OK, .sid = sid};
>> + uint64_t key_val, page_mask, aligned_addr;
>> + IOMMUTLBEntry *cached_entry = NULL;
>> SMMUPTWEventInfo ptw_info = {};
>> + SMMUTransTableInfo *tt;
>> SMMUTransCfg *cfg = NULL;
>> IOMMUTLBEntry entry = {
>> .target_as = &address_space_memory,
>> @@ -585,6 +591,7 @@ static IOMMUTLBEntry smmuv3_translate(IOMMUMemoryRegion *mr, hwaddr addr,
>> .addr_mask = ~(hwaddr)0,
>> .perm = IOMMU_NONE,
>> };
>> + uint64_t *key;
>> int ret = 0;
>>
>> if (!smmu_enabled(s)) {
>> @@ -607,7 +614,56 @@ static IOMMUTLBEntry smmuv3_translate(IOMMUMemoryRegion *mr, hwaddr addr,
>> goto out;
>> }
>>
>> - ret = smmu_ptw(cfg, addr, flag, &entry, &ptw_info);
>> + tt = select_tt(cfg, addr);
>> + if (!tt) {
>> + if (event.record_trans_faults) {
>> + event.type = SMMU_EVT_F_TRANSLATION;
>> + event.u.f_translation.addr = addr;
>> + event.u.f_translation.rnw = flag & 0x1;
>> + }
>> + ret = -EINVAL;
>> + goto out;
>> + }
>> +
>> + page_mask = (1ULL << (tt->granule_sz)) - 1;
>> + aligned_addr = addr & ~page_mask;
>> +
>> + key_val = SMMU_IOTLB_KEY(cfg->asid, aligned_addr);
>> +
>> + cached_entry = g_hash_table_lookup(bs->iotlb, &key_val);
>> + if (cached_entry) {
>> + cfg->iotlb_hit += 1;
>> + trace_smmu_iotlb_cache_hit(cfg->asid, aligned_addr,
>> + cfg->iotlb_hit, cfg->iotlb_miss,
>> + 100 * cfg->iotlb_hit /
>> + (cfg->iotlb_hit + cfg->iotlb_miss));
>> + if ((flag & IOMMU_WO) && !(cached_entry->perm & IOMMU_WO)) {
>> + ret = -EFAULT;
>> + if (event.record_trans_faults) {
>> + event.type = SMMU_EVT_F_PERMISSION;
>> + event.u.f_permission.addr = addr;
>> + event.u.f_permission.rnw = flag & 0x1;
>> + }
>> + }
>> + goto out;
>> + }
>> +
>> + cfg->iotlb_miss += 1;
>> + trace_smmu_iotlb_cache_miss(cfg->asid, addr & ~page_mask,
>> + cfg->iotlb_hit, cfg->iotlb_miss,
>> + 100 * cfg->iotlb_hit /
>> + (cfg->iotlb_hit + cfg->iotlb_miss));
>> +
>> + if (g_hash_table_size(bs->iotlb) >= SMMU_IOTLB_MAX_SIZE) {
>> + smmu_iotlb_inv_all(bs);
>> + }
>> +
>> + cached_entry = g_new0(IOMMUTLBEntry, 1);
>> + key = g_new0(uint64_t, 1);
>> + *key = key_val;
>> + g_hash_table_insert(bs->iotlb, key, cached_entry);
>> +
>> + ret = smmu_ptw(cfg, aligned_addr, flag, cached_entry, &ptw_info);
>> if (ret) {
>> switch (ptw_info.type) {
>> case SMMU_PTW_ERR_WALK_EABT:
>> @@ -656,8 +712,14 @@ out:
>> mr->parent_obj.name, addr, ret);
>> entry.perm = IOMMU_NONE;
>> smmuv3_record_event(s, &event);
>> + if (cached_entry) {
>> + smmu_iotlb_inv_iova(bs, cfg->asid, aligned_addr);
>> + }
>
> This is doing that weird "insert an entry into the cache
> and then remove it again" logic.
fixed
>
>> } else if (!cfg->aborted) {
>> entry.perm = flag;
>> + entry.translated_addr = cached_entry->translated_addr +
>> + (addr & page_mask);
>> + entry.addr_mask = cached_entry->addr_mask;
>> trace_smmuv3_translate(mr->parent_obj.name, sid, addr,
>> entry.translated_addr, entry.perm);
>> }
>> @@ -781,10 +843,46 @@ static int smmuv3_cmdq_consume(SMMUv3State *s)
>> smmuv3_put_config(sdev);
>> break;
>> }
>> - case SMMU_CMD_TLBI_NH_ALL:
>> case SMMU_CMD_TLBI_NH_ASID:
>> - case SMMU_CMD_TLBI_NH_VA:
>> + {
>> + uint16_t asid = CMD_ASID(&cmd);
>> +
>> + trace_smmuv3_cmdq_tlbi_nh_asid(asid);
>> + /* TODO: be more precise and invalidate for @asid */
>> + smmu_iotlb_inv_asid(bs, asid);
>
> TODO comment says we should invalidate for this ASID only, but
> the code seems to do that already ?
removed
>
>> + break;
>> + }
>> + case SMMU_CMD_TLBI_NH_ALL:
>> + case SMMU_CMD_TLBI_NSNH_ALL:
>> + trace_smmuv3_cmdq_tlbi_nh();
>> + smmu_iotlb_inv_all(bs);
>> + break;
>> case SMMU_CMD_TLBI_NH_VAA:
>> + {
>> + dma_addr_t addr = CMD_ADDR(&cmd);
>> + uint16_t vmid = CMD_VMID(&cmd);
>> +
>> + trace_smmuv3_cmdq_tlbi_nh_vaa(vmid, addr);
>> + smmu_iotlb_inv_all(bs);
>> + break;
>> + }
>> + case SMMU_CMD_TLBI_NH_VA:
>> + {
>> + uint16_t asid = CMD_ASID(&cmd);
>> + uint16_t vmid = CMD_VMID(&cmd);
>> + dma_addr_t addr = CMD_ADDR(&cmd);
>> + bool leaf = CMD_LEAF(&cmd);
>> +
>> + trace_smmuv3_cmdq_tlbi_nh_va(vmid, asid, addr, leaf);
>> + /**
>
> This isn't a doc-comment so it shouldn't have the double-asterisk
> doc-comment syntax.
removed
>
>> + * we don't know the size of the granule so
>> + * let's invalidate both 4K entry and 64kB entry.
>> + * The spec allow to invalidate more than necessary.
>> + */
>> + smmu_iotlb_inv_iova(bs, asid, addr & ~0xFFF);
>> + smmu_iotlb_inv_iova(bs, asid, addr & ~0xFFFF);
>> + break;
>> + }
>> case SMMU_CMD_TLBI_EL3_ALL:
>> case SMMU_CMD_TLBI_EL3_VA:
>> case SMMU_CMD_TLBI_EL2_ALL:
>> @@ -793,7 +891,6 @@ static int smmuv3_cmdq_consume(SMMUv3State *s)
>> case SMMU_CMD_TLBI_EL2_VAA:
>> case SMMU_CMD_TLBI_S12_VMALL:
>> case SMMU_CMD_TLBI_S2_IPA:
>> - case SMMU_CMD_TLBI_NSNH_ALL:
>> case SMMU_CMD_ATC_INV:
>> case SMMU_CMD_PRI_RESP:
>> case SMMU_CMD_RESUME:
>> diff --git a/hw/arm/trace-events b/hw/arm/trace-events
>> index ecc30be..7fdc08e 100644
>> --- a/hw/arm/trace-events
>> +++ b/hw/arm/trace-events
>> @@ -12,6 +12,11 @@ smmu_ptw_invalid_pte(int stage, int level, uint64_t baseaddr, uint64_t pteaddr,
>> smmu_ptw_page_pte(int stage, int level, uint64_t iova, uint64_t baseaddr, uint64_t pteaddr, uint64_t pte, uint64_t address) "stage=%d level=%d iova=0x%"PRIx64" base@=0x%"PRIx64" pte@=0x%"PRIx64" pte=0x%"PRIx64" page address = 0x%"PRIx64
>> smmu_ptw_block_pte(int stage, int level, uint64_t baseaddr, uint64_t pteaddr, uint64_t pte, uint64_t iova, uint64_t gpa, int bsize_mb) "stage=%d level=%d base@=0x%"PRIx64" pte@=0x%"PRIx64" pte=0x%"PRIx64" iova=0x%"PRIx64" block address = 0x%"PRIx64" block size = %d MiB"
>> smmu_get_pte(uint64_t baseaddr, int index, uint64_t pteaddr, uint64_t pte) "baseaddr=0x%"PRIx64" index=0x%x, pteaddr=0x%"PRIx64", pte=0x%"PRIx64
>> +smmu_iotlb_cache_hit(uint16_t asid, uint64_t addr, uint32_t hit, uint32_t miss, float p) "IOTLB cache HIT asid=%d addr=0x%"PRIx64" hit=%d miss=%d hit rate=%.1f"
>> +smmu_iotlb_cache_miss(uint16_t asid, uint64_t addr, uint32_t hit, uint32_t miss, float p) "IOTLB cache MISS asid=%d addr=0x%"PRIx64" hit=%d miss=%d hit rate=%.1f"
>> +smmu_iotlb_inv_all(void) "IOTLB invalidate all"
>> +smmu_iotlb_inv_asid(uint16_t asid) "IOTLB invalidate asid=%d"
>> +smmu_iotlb_inv_iova(uint16_t asid, uint64_t addr) "IOTLB invalidate asid=%d addr=0x%"PRIx64
>>
>> #hw/arm/smmuv3.c
>> smmuv3_read_mmio(uint64_t addr, uint64_t val, unsigned size, uint32_t r) "addr: 0x%"PRIx64" val:0x%"PRIx64" size: 0x%x(%d)"
>> @@ -41,6 +46,10 @@ smmuv3_decode_cd(uint32_t oas) "oas=%d"
>> smmuv3_decode_cd_tt(int i, uint32_t tsz, uint64_t ttb, uint32_t granule_sz, int initial_level) "TT[%d]:tsz:%d ttb:0x%"PRIx64" granule_sz:%d, initial_level = %d"
>> smmuv3_cmdq_cfgi_ste(int streamid) " |_ streamid =%d"
>> smmuv3_cmdq_cfgi_ste_range(int start, int end) " |_ start=0x%d - end=0x%d"
>> +smmuv3_cmdq_tlbi_nh_va(int vmid, int asid, uint64_t addr, bool leaf) " |_ vmid =%d asid =%d addr=0x%"PRIx64" leaf=%d"
>> +smmuv3_cmdq_tlbi_nh_vaa(int vmid, uint64_t addr) " |_ vmid =%d addr=0x%"PRIx64
>> +smmuv3_cmdq_tlbi_nh(void) ""
>> +smmuv3_cmdq_tlbi_nh_asid(uint16_t asid) "asid=%d"
>> smmuv3_cmdq_cfgi_cd(uint32_t sid) " |_ streamid = %d"
>> smmuv3_config_cache_hit(uint32_t sid) "Config cache HIT for sid %d"
>> smmuv3_config_cache_miss(uint32_t sid) "Config cache MISS for sid %d"
>> diff --git a/include/hw/arm/smmu-common.h b/include/hw/arm/smmu-common.h
>> index ff07734..1c9c648 100644
>> --- a/include/hw/arm/smmu-common.h
>> +++ b/include/hw/arm/smmu-common.h
>> @@ -68,6 +68,8 @@ typedef struct SMMUTransCfg {
>> uint8_t tbi; /* Top Byte Ignore */
>> uint16_t asid;
>> SMMUTransTableInfo tt[2];
>> + uint32_t iotlb_hit;
>> + uint32_t iotlb_miss;
>
> Are these just gathering hit/miss statistics for the tracing?
> Could we have a comment saying what they're for? From the
> name of the fields I was expecting them to be boolean flags;
> if they're counts of hits and misses then iotlb_hits and
> iotlb_misses might be better?
yes it does. renamed and comment added.
>
>> } SMMUTransCfg;
>>
>> typedef struct SMMUDevice {
>> @@ -146,4 +148,13 @@ SMMUTransTableInfo *select_tt(SMMUTransCfg *cfg, dma_addr_t iova);
>> /* Return the iommu mr associated to @sid, or NULL if none */
>> IOMMUMemoryRegion *smmu_iommu_mr(SMMUState *s, uint32_t sid);
>>
>> +#define SMMU_IOTLB_MAX_SIZE 256
>> +#define IOTLB_KEY_ASID_SHIFT SMMU_MAX_VA_BITS
>> +#define SMMU_IOTLB_KEY(asid, iova) \
>> + (iova | (uint64_t)(asid) << IOTLB_KEY_ASID_SHIFT);
>
> This choice of key layout makes future changes to the SMMU
> implementation a bit painful. Currently SMMU_MAX_VA_BITS is 48,
> so since the ASID is 16 bits that's the entirety of the 64 bit key.
> We're also likely at some point to want to include in the key:
> * 16 bit VMID
> * larger address sizes (ie bigger SMMU_MAX_VA_BITS)
> * translation regime (StreamWorld)
>
> I think it would be better to define a struct and a custom
> equality comparison function rather than using uint64_t and
> g_int64_equal().
Implemented the key as a struct and used a Jenkins hash
Thanks
Eric
>
>> +
>> +void smmu_iotlb_inv_all(SMMUState *s);
>> +void smmu_iotlb_inv_asid(SMMUState *s, uint16_t asid);
>> +void smmu_iotlb_inv_iova(SMMUState *s, uint16_t asid, dma_addr_t iova);
>> +
>> #endif /* HW_ARM_SMMU_COMMON */
>> --
>> 2.5.5
>
> thanks
> -- PMM
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-04-25 14:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-04-12 7:37 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v11 00/17] ARM SMMUv3 Emulation Support Eric Auger
2018-04-12 7:37 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v11 01/17] hw/arm/smmu-common: smmu base device and datatypes Eric Auger
2018-04-12 7:37 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v11 02/17] hw/arm/smmu-common: IOMMU memory region and address space setup Eric Auger
2018-04-16 12:33 ` Peter Maydell
2018-04-12 7:37 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v11 03/17] hw/arm/smmu-common: VMSAv8-64 page table walk Eric Auger
2018-04-16 12:59 ` Peter Maydell
2018-04-23 12:10 ` Auger Eric
2018-04-23 14:03 ` Peter Maydell
2018-04-12 7:37 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v11 04/17] hw/arm/smmuv3: Skeleton Eric Auger
2018-04-16 13:08 ` Peter Maydell
2018-04-23 12:48 ` Auger Eric
2018-04-12 7:37 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v11 05/17] hw/arm/smmuv3: Wired IRQ and GERROR helpers Eric Auger
2018-04-16 13:10 ` Peter Maydell
2018-04-12 7:37 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v11 06/17] hw/arm/smmuv3: Queue helpers Eric Auger
2018-04-16 16:41 ` Peter Maydell
2018-04-12 7:37 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v11 07/17] hw/arm/smmuv3: Implement MMIO write operations Eric Auger
2018-04-16 16:46 ` Peter Maydell
2018-04-12 7:37 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v11 08/17] hw/arm/smmuv3: Event queue recording helper Eric Auger
2018-04-16 16:51 ` Peter Maydell
2018-04-23 20:17 ` Auger Eric
2018-04-12 7:38 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v11 09/17] hw/arm/smmuv3: Implement translate callback Eric Auger
2018-04-17 10:50 ` Peter Maydell
2018-04-12 7:38 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v11 10/17] hw/arm/smmuv3: Abort on vfio or vhost case Eric Auger
2018-04-17 10:51 ` Peter Maydell
2018-04-12 7:38 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v11 11/17] target/arm/kvm: Translate the MSI doorbell in kvm_arch_fixup_msi_route Eric Auger
2018-04-17 11:02 ` Peter Maydell
2018-04-25 14:43 ` Auger Eric
2018-04-12 7:38 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v11 12/17] hw/arm/virt: Add SMMUv3 to the virt board Eric Auger
2018-04-12 7:38 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v11 13/17] hw/arm/virt-acpi-build: Add smmuv3 node in IORT table Eric Auger
2018-04-12 7:38 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v11 14/17] hw/arm/virt: Introduce the iommu option Eric Auger
2018-04-16 16:55 ` Peter Maydell
2018-04-12 7:38 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v11 15/17] hw/arm/smmuv3: Cache/invalidate config data Eric Auger
2018-04-17 12:22 ` Peter Maydell
2018-04-12 7:38 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v11 16/17] hw/arm/smmuv3: IOTLB emulation Eric Auger
2018-04-17 12:55 ` Peter Maydell
2018-04-25 14:48 ` Auger Eric [this message]
2018-04-12 7:38 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v11 17/17] hw/arm/smmuv3: Add notifications on invalidation Eric Auger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1587be11-1064-7f76-12d0-0441f61e6a03@redhat.com \
--to=eric.auger@redhat.com \
--cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
--cc=bharat.bhushan@nxp.com \
--cc=cdall@kernel.org \
--cc=eric.auger.pro@gmail.com \
--cc=jean-philippe.brucker@arm.com \
--cc=jintack@cs.columbia.edu \
--cc=linuc.decode@gmail.com \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
--cc=peterx@redhat.com \
--cc=prem.mallappa@gmail.com \
--cc=qemu-arm@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=tn@semihalf.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).