From: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
To: Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>, Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>,
Halil Pasic <pasic@linux.ibm.com>,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@linux.ibm.com>,
Eric Farman <farman@linux.ibm.com>,
David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, qemu-s390x@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] accel/tcg: Fix unaligned stores to s390x low-address-protected lowcore
Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2022 10:42:56 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <158ff2f0-ed49-1551-265c-cf7b068ddb8a@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220711185640.3558813-2-iii@linux.ibm.com>
On 7/12/22 00:26, Ilya Leoshkevich wrote:
> If low-address-protection is active, unaligned stores to non-protected
> parts of lowcore lead to protection exceptions. The reason is that in
> such cases tlb_fill() call in store_helper_unaligned() covers
> [0, addr + size) range, which contains the protected portion of
> lowcore. This range is too large.
>
> The most straightforward fix would be to make sure we stay within the
> original [addr, addr + size) range. However, if an unaligned access
> affects a single page, we don't need to call tlb_fill() in
> store_helper_unaligned() at all, since it would be identical to
> the previous tlb_fill() call in store_helper(), and therefore a no-op.
> If an unaligned access covers multiple pages, this situation does not
> occur.
>
> Therefore simply skip TLB handling in store_helper_unaligned() if we
> are dealing with a single page.
>
> Fixes: 2bcf018340cb ("s390x/tcg: low-address protection support")
> Signed-off-by: Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Queueing to tcg-next. I'll let the test case go through s390x.
r~
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-07-12 5:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-07-11 18:56 [PATCH 0/3] accel/tcg: Fix unaligned stores to s390x low-address-protected lowcore Ilya Leoshkevich
2022-07-11 18:56 ` [PATCH 1/3] " Ilya Leoshkevich
2022-07-12 5:12 ` Richard Henderson [this message]
2022-07-12 7:14 ` David Hildenbrand
2022-07-11 18:56 ` [PATCH 2/3] hw/misc: Add mmio-debug-exit device Ilya Leoshkevich
2022-07-12 5:12 ` Richard Henderson
2022-07-12 9:52 ` Ilya Leoshkevich
2022-07-12 10:08 ` David Hildenbrand
2022-07-12 10:08 ` David Hildenbrand
2022-07-12 10:30 ` Ilya Leoshkevich
2022-07-11 18:56 ` [PATCH 3/3] tests/tcg/s390x: Test unaligned accesses to lowcore Ilya Leoshkevich
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=158ff2f0-ed49-1551-265c-cf7b068ddb8a@linaro.org \
--to=richard.henderson@linaro.org \
--cc=borntraeger@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=cohuck@redhat.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=farman@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=iii@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=pasic@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-s390x@nongnu.org \
--cc=thuth@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).