qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christian Schoenebeck <qemu_oss@crudebyte.com>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Cc: Greg Kurz <groug@kaod.org>
Subject: [PULL 6/7] tests/9pfs: guard recent 'Twalk' behaviour fix
Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2022 13:00:04 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <15fbff488a908af01210071ffad70f9254d077fc.1655377203.git.qemu_oss@crudebyte.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1655377203.git.qemu_oss@crudebyte.com>

Previous 9p patch fixed 'Twalk' request handling, which was previously not
behaving as specified by the 9p2000 protocol spec. This patch adds a new test
case which guards the new 'Twalk' behaviour in question.

More specifically: it sends a 'Twalk' request where the 1st path component
is valid, whereas the 2nd path component transmitted to server does not
exist. The expected behaviour is that 9p server would respond by sending
a 'Rwalk' response with exactly 1 QID (instead of 'Rlerror' response).

Signed-off-by: Christian Schoenebeck <qemu_oss@crudebyte.com>
Reviewed-by: Greg Kurz <groug@kaod.org>
Message-Id: <61bde2f44b87e24b70ec098dfb81765665b2dfcb.1647339025.git.qemu_oss@crudebyte.com>
---
 tests/qtest/virtio-9p-test.c | 42 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
 1 file changed, 39 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tests/qtest/virtio-9p-test.c b/tests/qtest/virtio-9p-test.c
index 3c0f094929..c787ded4d2 100644
--- a/tests/qtest/virtio-9p-test.c
+++ b/tests/qtest/virtio-9p-test.c
@@ -669,8 +669,12 @@ static void do_version(QVirtio9P *v9p)
     g_assert_cmpmem(server_version, server_len, version, strlen(version));
 }
 
-/* utility function: walk to requested dir and return fid for that dir */
-static uint32_t do_walk(QVirtio9P *v9p, const char *path)
+/*
+ * utility function: walk to requested dir and return fid for that dir and
+ * the QIDs of server response
+ */
+static uint32_t do_walk_rqids(QVirtio9P *v9p, const char *path, uint16_t *nwqid,
+                              v9fs_qid **wqid)
 {
     char **wnames;
     P9Req *req;
@@ -680,12 +684,18 @@ static uint32_t do_walk(QVirtio9P *v9p, const char *path)
 
     req = v9fs_twalk(v9p, 0, fid, nwnames, wnames, 0);
     v9fs_req_wait_for_reply(req, NULL);
-    v9fs_rwalk(req, NULL, NULL);
+    v9fs_rwalk(req, nwqid, wqid);
 
     split_free(&wnames);
     return fid;
 }
 
+/* utility function: walk to requested dir and return fid for that dir */
+static uint32_t do_walk(QVirtio9P *v9p, const char *path)
+{
+    return do_walk_rqids(v9p, path, NULL, NULL);
+}
+
 /* utility function: walk to requested dir and expect passed error response */
 static void do_walk_expect_error(QVirtio9P *v9p, const char *path, uint32_t err)
 {
@@ -1079,9 +1089,33 @@ static void fs_walk_nonexistent(void *obj, void *data, QGuestAllocator *t_alloc)
     alloc = t_alloc;
 
     do_attach(v9p);
+    /*
+     * The 9p2000 protocol spec says: "If the first element cannot be walked
+     * for any reason, Rerror is returned."
+     */
     do_walk_expect_error(v9p, "non-existent", ENOENT);
 }
 
+static void fs_walk_2nd_nonexistent(void *obj, void *data,
+                                    QGuestAllocator *t_alloc)
+{
+    QVirtio9P *v9p = obj;
+    alloc = t_alloc;
+    uint16_t nwqid;
+    g_autofree v9fs_qid *wqid = NULL;
+    g_autofree char *path = g_strdup_printf(
+        QTEST_V9FS_SYNTH_WALK_FILE "/non-existent", 0
+    );
+
+    do_attach(v9p);
+    do_walk_rqids(v9p, path, &nwqid, &wqid);
+    /*
+     * The 9p2000 protocol spec says: "nwqid is therefore either nwname or the
+     * index of the first elementwise walk that failed."
+     */
+    assert(nwqid == 1);
+}
+
 static void fs_walk_none(void *obj, void *data, QGuestAllocator *t_alloc)
 {
     QVirtio9P *v9p = obj;
@@ -1548,6 +1582,8 @@ static void register_virtio_9p_test(void)
                  fs_walk_dotdot,  &opts);
     qos_add_test("synth/walk/non_existent", "virtio-9p", fs_walk_nonexistent,
                   &opts);
+    qos_add_test("synth/walk/2nd_non_existent", "virtio-9p",
+                 fs_walk_2nd_nonexistent, &opts);
     qos_add_test("synth/lopen/basic", "virtio-9p", fs_lopen,  &opts);
     qos_add_test("synth/write/basic", "virtio-9p", fs_write,  &opts);
     qos_add_test("synth/flush/success", "virtio-9p", fs_flush_success,
-- 
2.30.2



  reply	other threads:[~2022-06-16 11:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-06-16 11:00 [PULL 0/7] 9p queue 2022-06-16 Christian Schoenebeck
2022-06-16 11:00 ` Christian Schoenebeck [this message]
2022-06-16 11:00 ` [PULL 1/7] tests/9pfs: walk to non-existent dir Christian Schoenebeck
2022-06-16 11:00 ` [PULL 4/7] 9pfs: refactor 'name_idx' -> 'nwalked' in v9fs_walk() Christian Schoenebeck
2022-06-16 11:00 ` [PULL 2/7] tests/9pfs: Twalk with nwname=0 Christian Schoenebeck
2022-06-16 11:00 ` [PULL 5/7] 9pfs: fix 'Twalk' to only send error if no component walked Christian Schoenebeck via
2022-06-16 11:00 ` [PULL 3/7] tests/9pfs: compare QIDs in fs_walk_none() test Christian Schoenebeck
2022-06-16 11:00 ` [PULL 7/7] tests/9pfs: check fid being unaffected in fs_walk_2nd_nonexistent Christian Schoenebeck
2022-06-16 18:24 ` [PULL 0/7] 9p queue 2022-06-16 Richard Henderson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=15fbff488a908af01210071ffad70f9254d077fc.1655377203.git.qemu_oss@crudebyte.com \
    --to=qemu_oss@crudebyte.com \
    --cc=groug@kaod.org \
    --cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).