From: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
To: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>,
Greg Kurz <groug@kaod.org>, Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
Cc: qemu-ppc@nongnu.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: [PATCH] hw/net: fsl_etsec: Do not reject short frames
Date: Mon, 8 Feb 2021 14:41:05 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1612766465-7639-1-git-send-email-bin.meng@windriver.com> (raw)
As of today both slirp and tap networking do not pad short frames
(e.g.: an ARP packet) to the minimum frame size of 60 bytes.
If eTSEC is programmed to reject short frames, ARP requests will be
dropped, preventing the guest from becoming visible on the network.
The same issue was reported on e1000 and vmxenet3 before, see:
commit 78aeb23eded2 ("e1000: Pad short frames to minimum size (60 bytes)")
commit 40a87c6c9b11 ("vmxnet3: Pad short frames to minimum size (60 bytes)")
Ideally this should be fixed on the slirp/tap networking side to
pad short frames to the minimum frame length, but I am not sure
whether that's doable.
This commit changes to codes to ignore the RCTRL_RSF setting and
still allow receiving the short frame. The log message is updated
to mention the reject short frames functionality is unimplemented.
Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
---
hw/net/fsl_etsec/rings.c | 11 +++++++++--
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/hw/net/fsl_etsec/rings.c b/hw/net/fsl_etsec/rings.c
index 121415a..503b4d3 100644
--- a/hw/net/fsl_etsec/rings.c
+++ b/hw/net/fsl_etsec/rings.c
@@ -502,10 +502,17 @@ ssize_t etsec_rx_ring_write(eTSEC *etsec, const uint8_t *buf, size_t size)
return -1;
}
+ /*
+ * Both slirp and tap networking do not pad short frames
+ * (e.g.: an ARP packet) to the minimum frame size of 60 bytes.
+ *
+ * If eTSEC is programmed to reject short frames, ARP requests
+ * will be dropped, preventing the guest from becoming visible
+ * on the network.
+ */
if ((etsec->regs[RCTRL].value & RCTRL_RSF) && (size < 60)) {
/* CRC is not in the packet yet, so short frame is below 60 bytes */
- RING_DEBUG("%s: Drop short frame\n", __func__);
- return -1;
+ RING_DEBUG("%s: Drop short frame not implemented\n", __func__);
}
rx_init_frame(etsec, buf, size);
--
2.7.4
next reply other threads:[~2021-02-08 11:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-02-08 6:41 Bin Meng [this message]
2021-02-08 11:58 ` [PATCH] hw/net: fsl_etsec: Do not reject short frames Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1612766465-7639-1-git-send-email-bin.meng@windriver.com \
--to=bmeng.cn@gmail.com \
--cc=david@gibson.dropbear.id.au \
--cc=groug@kaod.org \
--cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-ppc@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).