From: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
To: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>,
David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>,
Greg Kurz <groug@kaod.org>, Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
Cc: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>,
qemu-ppc@nongnu.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: [PATCH v3] hw/net: fsl_etsec: Reverse the RCTRL.RSF logic
Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2021 10:10:21 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1612923021-19746-1-git-send-email-bmeng.cn@gmail.com> (raw)
From: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
Per MPC8548ERM [1] chapter 14.5.3.4.1:
When RCTRL.RSF is 1, frames less than 64 bytes are accepted upon
a DA match. But currently QEMU does the opposite. This commit
reverses the RCTRL.RSF testing logic to match the manual.
Due to the reverse of the logic, certain guests may potentially
break if they don't program eTSEC to have RCTRL.RSF bit set.
When RCTRL.RSF is 0, short frames are silently dropped, however
as of today both slirp and tap networking do not pad short frames
(e.g.: an ARP packet) to the minimum frame size of 60 bytes. So
ARP requests will be dropped, preventing the guest from becoming
visible on the network.
The same issue was reported on e1000 and vmxenet3 before, see:
commit 78aeb23eded2 ("e1000: Pad short frames to minimum size (60 bytes)")
commit 40a87c6c9b11 ("vmxnet3: Pad short frames to minimum size (60 bytes)")
[1] https://www.nxp.com/docs/en/reference-manual/MPC8548ERM.pdf
Fixes: eb1e7c3e5146 ("Add Enhanced Three-Speed Ethernet Controller (eTSEC)")
Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
---
Changes in v3:
- remove the slirp/tap networking workaround and only do the reverse
Changes in v2:
- rewrite the commit message and reverse the RCTRL.RSF test logic
hw/net/fsl_etsec/rings.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/hw/net/fsl_etsec/rings.c b/hw/net/fsl_etsec/rings.c
index 121415a..fe055d3 100644
--- a/hw/net/fsl_etsec/rings.c
+++ b/hw/net/fsl_etsec/rings.c
@@ -502,7 +502,7 @@ ssize_t etsec_rx_ring_write(eTSEC *etsec, const uint8_t *buf, size_t size)
return -1;
}
- if ((etsec->regs[RCTRL].value & RCTRL_RSF) && (size < 60)) {
+ if (!(etsec->regs[RCTRL].value & RCTRL_RSF) && (size < 60)) {
/* CRC is not in the packet yet, so short frame is below 60 bytes */
RING_DEBUG("%s: Drop short frame\n", __func__);
return -1;
--
2.7.4
next reply other threads:[~2021-02-10 2:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-02-10 2:10 Bin Meng [this message]
2021-02-10 3:38 ` [PATCH v3] hw/net: fsl_etsec: Reverse the RCTRL.RSF logic David Gibson
2021-02-11 11:04 ` no-reply
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1612923021-19746-1-git-send-email-bmeng.cn@gmail.com \
--to=bmeng.cn@gmail.com \
--cc=bin.meng@windriver.com \
--cc=david@gibson.dropbear.id.au \
--cc=groug@kaod.org \
--cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
--cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-ppc@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).