From: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
To: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>, Greg Kurz <groug@kaod.org>
Cc: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>,
qemu-ppc@nongnu.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: [PATCH] hw/ppc: e500: Add missing <ranges> in the eTSEC node
Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2021 17:28:39 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1614158919-9473-1-git-send-email-bmeng.cn@gmail.com> (raw)
From: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
The eTSEC node should provide an empty <ranges> property in the
eTSEC node, otherwise of_translate_address() in the Linux kernel
fails to get the eTSEC register base, reporting:
OF: ** translation for device /platform@f00000000/ethernet@0/queue-group **
OF: bus is default (na=1, ns=1) on /platform@f00000000/ethernet@0
OF: translating address: 00000000
OF: parent bus is default (na=1, ns=1) on /platform@f00000000
OF: no ranges; cannot translate
Per devicetree spec v0.3 [1] chapter 2.3.8:
If the property is not present in a bus node, it is assumed that
no mapping exists between children of the node and the parent
address space.
This is why of_translate_address() aborts the address translation.
Apparently U-Boot devicetree parser seems to be tolerant with
missing <ranges> as this was not noticed when testing with U-Boot.
The empty <ranges> property is present in all kernel shipped dtsi
files for eTSEC, Let's add it to conform with the spec.
[1] https://github.com/devicetree-org/devicetree-specification/releases/download/v0.3/devicetree-specification-v0.3.pdf
Fixes: fdfb7f2cdb2d ("e500: Add support for eTSEC in device tree")
Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
---
hw/ppc/e500.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/hw/ppc/e500.c b/hw/ppc/e500.c
index c84a021..79467ac 100644
--- a/hw/ppc/e500.c
+++ b/hw/ppc/e500.c
@@ -231,6 +231,7 @@ static int create_devtree_etsec(SysBusDevice *sbdev, PlatformDevtreeData *data)
assert(irq2 >= 0);
qemu_fdt_add_subnode(fdt, node);
+ qemu_fdt_setprop(fdt, node, "ranges", NULL, 0);
qemu_fdt_setprop_string(fdt, node, "device_type", "network");
qemu_fdt_setprop_string(fdt, node, "compatible", "fsl,etsec2");
qemu_fdt_setprop_string(fdt, node, "model", "eTSEC");
--
2.7.4
next reply other threads:[~2021-02-24 9:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-02-24 9:28 Bin Meng [this message]
2021-02-28 7:02 ` [PATCH] hw/ppc: e500: Add missing <ranges> in the eTSEC node Bin Meng
2021-03-01 3:57 ` David Gibson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1614158919-9473-1-git-send-email-bmeng.cn@gmail.com \
--to=bmeng.cn@gmail.com \
--cc=bin.meng@windriver.com \
--cc=david@gibson.dropbear.id.au \
--cc=groug@kaod.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-ppc@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).