From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Hm8R3-000211-8x for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 10 May 2007 09:11:57 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Hm8R2-00020R-Hc for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 10 May 2007 09:11:56 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Hm8R2-0001zz-93 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 10 May 2007 09:11:56 -0400 Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de ([212.227.126.177]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Hm8Ji-0002Py-7R for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 10 May 2007 09:04:22 -0400 Message-Id: <16250307.53171178802253324.JavaMail.servlet@kundenserver> From: adrian.lambeck@basicsedv.de MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Thu, 10 May 2007 15:04:13 +0200 Subject: [Qemu-devel] vdq and qemu Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Hi, I am using qemu-0.9 with vde to connect to a vde_switch. It works fine. My question is if I can also use the wirefilter feature of vde in this context without changing vdeq? Does anybody have experience with this ? Thanks Adrian Lambeck