From: "Liu, Jingqi" <jingqi.liu@intel.com>
To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Cc: "Peter Maydell" <peter.maydell@linaro.org>,
"Ján Tomko" <jtomko@redhat.com>,
"QEMU Developers" <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>,
"Eduardo Habkost" <ehabkost@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] util: fix to get configuration macros in util/mmap-alloc.c
Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2020 08:43:18 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <16328974-3c7f-0e69-9614-a085c5841a2e@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200310051003-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org>
On 3/10/2020 5:12 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 10, 2020 at 04:58:38PM +0800, Liu, Jingqi wrote:
>> On 3/9/2020 9:35 PM, Peter Maydell wrote:
>>> On Mon, 9 Mar 2020 at 13:23, Liu, Jingqi <jingqi.liu@intel.com> wrote:
>>>> On 3/6/2020 12:40 AM, Peter Maydell wrote:
>>>>> On Thu, 5 Mar 2020 at 16:11, Ján Tomko <jtomko@redhat.com> wrote:
>>>>>> On a Thursday in 2020, Jingqi Liu wrote:
>>>>>>> The CONFIG_LINUX symbol is always not defined in this file.
>>>>>>> This fixes that "config-host.h" header file is not included
>>>>>>> for getting macros.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Jingqi Liu <jingqi.liu@intel.com>
>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>> util/mmap-alloc.c | 2 ++
>>>>>>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> diff --git a/util/mmap-alloc.c b/util/mmap-alloc.c
>>>>>>> index 27dcccd8ec..24c0e380f3 100644
>>>>>>> --- a/util/mmap-alloc.c
>>>>>>> +++ b/util/mmap-alloc.c
>>>>>>> @@ -10,6 +10,8 @@
>>>>>>> * later. See the COPYING file in the top-level directory.
>>>>>>> */
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> +#include "config-host.h"
>>>>>>> +
>>>>>> According to CODING_STYLE.rst, qemu/osdep.h is the header file
>>>>>> that should be included first, before all the other includes.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> So the minimal fix would be moving qemu/osdep.h up here.
>>>>> Yes, osdep must always be first.
>>>>>
>>>>>>> #ifdef CONFIG_LINUX
>>>>>>> #include <linux/mman.h>
>>>>>>> #else /* !CONFIG_LINUX */
>>>>> Do we really need this? osdep.h will pull in sys/mman.h
>>>>> for you, which should define the MAP_* constants.
>>>>>
>>>>> Also, you have no fallbmack for "I'm on Linux but the
>>>>> system headers don't define MAP_SHARED_VALIDATE or
>>>>> MAP_SYNC". Wouldn't it be better to just have
>>>>> #ifndef MAP_SYNC
>>>>> #define MAP_SYNC 0
>>>>> #endif
>>>>>
>>>>> etc ?
>>>> osdep.h pulls in sys/mman.h, which defines the MAP_* constants
>>>>
>>>> except for MAP_SYNC and MAP_SHARED_VALIDATE on Linux.
>>> Why not? Is this just "not yet in the version of glibc
>>> we're using", or is it a bug/missed feature in glibc
>>> that needs to be addressed there ?
>> I'm using the version 2.27 of glibc.
>>
>> I downloaded the version 2.28 of glibc source for compilation and
>> installation.
>>
>> I found MAP_SYNC and MAP_SHARED_VALIDATE are defined in this version.
>>
>> Seems it's older glibc version issue.
>>
>>>> How about just adding the following code in util/mmap-alloc.c ?
>>>> #ifndef MAP_SYNC
>>>> #define MAP_SYNC 0x80000
>>>> #endif
>>>>
>>>> #ifndef MAP_SHARED_VALIDATE
>>>> #define MAP_SHARED_VALIDATE 0x03
>>>> #endif
>>> You don't want to do that for non-Linux systems, so there
>>> you need to fall back to defining them to be 0.
>>>
>>> Are there any systems (distros) where the standard system
>>> sys/mman.h does not define these new MAP_* constants but we
>>> still really really need to use them? If not, then we
>>> could just have the fallback-to-0 fallback everywhere.
>> Good point.
>>
>> So as you mentioned, it would be better to just have the following code:
>>
>> #ifndef MAP_SYNC
>> #define MAP_SYNC 0
>> #endif
>>
>> #ifndef MAP_SHARED_VALIDATE
>> #define MAP_SHARED_VALIDATE 0
>> #endif
> Won't this defeat the purpose of MAP_SHARED_VALIDATE?
>
> We really have linux-headers/linux/mman.h for exactly this purpose.
Yes, linux-headers/linux/mman.h has defined MAP_SYNC and
MAP_SHARED_VALIDATE.
1) If '#include <linux/mman.h>' first then '#include qemu/osdep.h', it
should be fine.
2) Peter mentioned osdep.h should go first.
It will cause redefinitions of other MAP_* macros after '#include
<linux/mman.h>'.
This is where the conflict lies.
Any comments ?
Thanks,
Jingqi
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Jingqi
>>
>>> thanks
>>> -- PMM
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-03-11 0:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-03-05 15:41 [PATCH] util: fix to get configuration macros in util/mmap-alloc.c Jingqi Liu
2020-03-05 16:10 ` Ján Tomko
2020-03-05 16:40 ` Peter Maydell
2020-03-06 4:01 ` Liu, Jingqi
2020-03-09 13:23 ` Liu, Jingqi
2020-03-09 13:35 ` Peter Maydell
2020-03-10 8:58 ` Liu, Jingqi
2020-03-10 9:12 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2020-03-11 0:43 ` Liu, Jingqi [this message]
2020-03-11 12:37 ` Peter Maydell
2020-03-11 20:42 ` Eduardo Habkost
2020-03-06 2:48 ` Liu, Jingqi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=16328974-3c7f-0e69-9614-a085c5841a2e@intel.com \
--to=jingqi.liu@intel.com \
--cc=ehabkost@redhat.com \
--cc=jtomko@redhat.com \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).