From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Cc: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>,
Marcel Apfelbaum <marcel@redhat.com>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org, "Michael S . Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] msi: remove return code for msi_init()
Date: Wed, 31 May 2017 03:40:14 -0400 (EDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1633113774.3648008.1496216414543.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170531070346.GE14845@pxdev.xzpeter.org>
> > >> I'd prefer to remove msi_nonbroken completely if we don't
> > >> know where the problem is.
> > >
> > > So you're proposing to (1) remove msi_nonbroken, (2) see which boards
> > > burst into flames, and (3) fix them, or perhaps add a less wrong stop
> > > gap msi_broken just for them?
> >
> > Yes, adding back msi_broken is one "git revert" away.
>
> Not sure whether I got the point here, but... Adding msi_broken is not
> a "git revert"? Since there is no msi_broken before, only
> msi_supported.
Not exactly a "git revert", but pretty close since the logic for error reporting
is the same and those are the 100 lines your patch removes. The hard part is
finding which boards need it.
Paolo
> And iirc if we want to provide one msi_broken we need
> to know exactly all the borads that are broken with MSI, and that
> blacklist is something we don't have now (as you mentioned above)?
>
> Please correct me if I misunderstood.
>
> >
> > Of course, this means the edu memory leak should be fixed in a separate
> > small patch.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Paolo
>
> Thanks,
>
> --
> Peter Xu
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-05-31 7:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-05-15 13:14 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] msi: remove return code for msi_init() Peter Xu
2017-05-29 6:08 ` Peter Xu
2017-05-29 9:42 ` Markus Armbruster
2017-05-29 10:13 ` Peter Xu
2017-05-29 12:16 ` Markus Armbruster
2017-05-30 9:16 ` Paolo Bonzini
2017-05-30 14:28 ` Markus Armbruster
2017-05-30 14:29 ` Paolo Bonzini
2017-05-31 7:03 ` Peter Xu
2017-05-31 7:40 ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
2017-05-31 8:26 ` Peter Xu
2017-05-31 8:28 ` Paolo Bonzini
2017-05-31 8:55 ` Peter Xu
2017-06-01 8:27 ` Marcel Apfelbaum
2017-06-01 14:23 ` Paolo Bonzini
2017-06-01 19:22 ` Aurelien Jarno
2017-06-01 22:06 ` Paul Burton
2017-06-02 4:18 ` Peter Xu
2017-06-02 7:47 ` Markus Armbruster
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1633113774.3648008.1496216414543.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com \
--to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=armbru@redhat.com \
--cc=marcel@redhat.com \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=peterx@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).