From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1L0lfM-0002Zm-3l for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 13 Nov 2008 18:32:00 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1L0lfK-0002ZQ-JG for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 13 Nov 2008 18:31:59 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=53941 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1L0lfK-0002ZN-Av for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 13 Nov 2008 18:31:58 -0500 Received: from smtp5-g19.free.fr ([212.27.42.35]:53147) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1L0lfK-0005xO-5j for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 13 Nov 2008 18:31:58 -0500 In-Reply-To: <588538.91101.qm@web27207.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PowerPC] New board walnut with u-boot From: "=?windows-1252?q?Fran=E7ois?= Revol" Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2008 00:36:17 +0100 CET Message-Id: <16356729852-BeMail@laptop> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: salvatorelionetti@yahoo.it, qemu-devel@nongnu.org Hi, > i've ported u-boot-1.1.6 and DHT walnut board to qemu-0.9.1 > environment. > At qemu side: > - LACK of flash CFI interaction, i2c, PCI support, > - CONTAIN board parameter, serial, emac full support Oh, interesting. I want to port Haiku to the SAM440 board, which uses PPC, but also U- Boot (couldn't they just use OF =3F), so I'll need to add U-Boot support to Haiku, so I really welcome this to be able to test it :) http://www.sam440.com/eng/summerfollies.html Btw, 1.1.6 seems quite old for U-Boot... Do you plan on porting the current one too =3F I will need some features that are still being worked on (the external API, to use U-Boot as kind of minimal BIOS, to let our bootloader use it to send serial debug and do disk/other I/O before the kernel is loaded). > To integrate the patch, and simplify integration, i need some info > - is the current trunk in use svn://svn.sv.gnu.org/qemu/trunk=3F Yes. patches, and developments in general should be made against trunk, else you'll have to keep up merging your patches from the old version which wastes both your and the devs time. > - could i directly deliver such work=3F Just post the diff on this list, you'll get comments about them, and maybe commits if they are ok. Fran=E7ois.