From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:57570) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UNTqa-0006lI-Rf for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 03 Apr 2013 15:59:53 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UNTqY-0002pK-Tf for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 03 Apr 2013 15:59:52 -0400 Received: from mx3-phx2.redhat.com ([209.132.183.24]:50875) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UNTqY-0002oq-K2 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 03 Apr 2013 15:59:50 -0400 Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2013 15:59:48 -0400 (EDT) From: Paolo Bonzini Message-ID: <1659990344.56531.1365019188876.JavaMail.root@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20130403183958.GC28203@redhat.com> References: <20130403103301.GG18179@redhat.com> <20130403120041.GA22200@redhat.com> <515C1B0C.3070505@redhat.com> <20130403140648.GC22200@redhat.com> <515C37ED.1070104@redhat.com> <20130403150914.GA24295@redhat.com> <515C4E2C.40304@redhat.com> <20130403183958.GC28203@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 4/4] pci: add pci test device List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" Cc: gleb@redhat.com, mtosatti@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org ----- Messaggio originale ----- > Da: "Michael S. Tsirkin" > A: "Paolo Bonzini" > Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, gleb@redhat.com, mtosatti= @redhat.com > Inviato: Mercoled=C3=AC, 3 aprile 2013 20:39:58 > Oggetto: Re: [PATCH 4/4] pci: add pci test device >=20 > On Wed, Apr 03, 2013 at 05:43:40PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > > Il 03/04/2013 17:09, Michael S. Tsirkin ha scritto: > > > Okay after some more thought. > > > hw/pci-host/ > > > hw/pci-bridge/ > > > hw/isa-bridge/ > >=20 > > Renaming hw/isa to hw/isa-bridge is easy. > >=20 > > For the rest, I would prefer hw/pci/{core,host,bridge}, but whatever yo= u > > like the most is fine for me too. > >=20 > > Paolo >=20 > I'd prefer a single level as above, I get lost easily. The reason why I prefer deep structures is that I would like the directories to become the basis for a Kconfig menu. But I'll use the shallow structure, most of those symbols except in pci-bridge would probably be select-ed by the high level "board" symbols anyway. Paolo