qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Philippe Mathieu-Daudé" <philmd@linaro.org>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>,
	qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: "Daniel P. Berrangé" <berrange@redhat.com>,
	"Eduardo Habkost" <eduardo@habkost.net>,
	"Marcel Apfelbaum" <marcel.apfelbaum@gmail.com>,
	"Yanan Wang" <wangyanan55@huawei.com>,
	"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
	"Gonglei (Arei)" <arei.gonglei@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/10] hw/core/machine: Use qemu_register_resettable for sysbus reset
Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2024 16:42:16 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <16ef6303-7527-4ab8-8a8c-62e6892963c1@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240220160622.114437-10-peter.maydell@linaro.org>

On 20/2/24 17:06, Peter Maydell wrote:
> Move the reset of the sysbus (and thus all devices and buses anywhere
> on the qbus tree) from qemu_register_reset() to qemu_register_resettable().
> 
> This is a behaviour change: because qemu_register_resettable() is
> aware of three-phase reset, this now means that:
>   * 'enter' phase reset methods of devices and buses are called
>     before any legacy reset callbacks registered with qemu_register_reset()
>   * 'exit' phase reset methods of devices and buses are called
>     after any legacy qemu_register_reset() callbacks
> 
> Put another way, a qemu_register_reset() callback is now correctly
> ordered in the 'hold' phase along with any other 'hold' phase methods.
> 
> The motivation for doing this is that we will now be able to resolve
> some reset-ordering issues using the three-phase mechanism, because
> the 'exit' phase is always after the 'hold' phase, even when the
> 'hold' phase function was registered with qemu_register_reset().
> 
> Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
> ---
> I believe that given we don't make much use of enter/exit phases
> currently that this is unlikely to cause unexpected regressions due
> to an accidental reset-order dependency that is no longer satisfied,
> but it's always possible...
> ---
>   hw/core/machine.c | 7 +++----
>   1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/hw/core/machine.c b/hw/core/machine.c
> index fb5afdcae4c..9ac5d5389a6 100644
> --- a/hw/core/machine.c
> +++ b/hw/core/machine.c
> @@ -1577,14 +1577,13 @@ void qdev_machine_creation_done(void)
>       /* TODO: once all bus devices are qdevified, this should be done
>        * when bus is created by qdev.c */
>       /*
> -     * TODO: If we had a main 'reset container' that the whole system
> -     * lived in, we could reset that using the multi-phase reset
> -     * APIs. For the moment, we just reset the sysbus, which will cause
> +     * This is where we arrange for the sysbus to be reset when the
> +     * whole simulation is reset. In turn, resetting the sysbus will cause
>        * all devices hanging off it (and all their child buses, recursively)
>        * to be reset. Note that this will *not* reset any Device objects
>        * which are not attached to some part of the qbus tree!
>        */
> -    qemu_register_reset(resettable_cold_reset_fn, sysbus_get_default());
> +    qemu_register_resettable(OBJECT(sysbus_get_default()));

Correct, so:

Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org>

But I'd rather move that call to main_system_bus_create() in
hw/core/sysbus.c, as it doesn't seem to be related to the
machine creation phases anymore. Maybe clearer to do in a
separate patch although.

>       notifier_list_notify(&machine_init_done_notifiers, NULL);
>   



  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-02-21 15:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 49+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-02-20 16:06 [PATCH 00/10] reset: Make whole system three-phase-reset aware Peter Maydell
2024-02-20 16:06 ` [PATCH 01/10] hw/i386: Store pointers to IDE buses in PCMachineState Peter Maydell
2024-02-20 19:30   ` Richard Henderson
2024-02-21 13:07   ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2024-02-21 13:51     ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2024-02-26 13:54   ` Zhao Liu
2024-02-20 16:06 ` [PATCH 02/10] hw/i386/pc: Do pc_cmos_init_late() from pc_machine_done() Peter Maydell
2024-02-20 19:31   ` Richard Henderson
2024-02-20 21:19     ` Peter Maydell
2024-02-20 23:10   ` Bernhard Beschow
2024-02-21 15:21   ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2024-02-26 14:09   ` Zhao Liu
2024-02-20 16:06 ` [PATCH 03/10] system/bootdevice: Don't unregister reset handler in restore_boot_order() Peter Maydell
2024-02-20 19:35   ` Richard Henderson
2024-02-26 14:16   ` Zhao Liu
2024-02-20 16:06 ` [PATCH 04/10] include/qom/object.h: New OBJECT_DEFINE_SIMPLE_TYPE{, _WITH_INTERFACES} macros Peter Maydell
2024-02-20 19:40   ` Richard Henderson
2024-02-26 14:33   ` Zhao Liu
2024-02-20 16:06 ` [PATCH 05/10] hw/core: Add documentation and license comments to reset.h Peter Maydell
2024-02-20 19:41   ` Richard Henderson
2024-02-26 14:27   ` Zhao Liu
2024-02-26 14:28     ` Peter Maydell
2024-02-20 16:06 ` [PATCH 06/10] hw/core: Add ResetContainer which holds objects implementing Resettable Peter Maydell
2024-02-20 19:43   ` Richard Henderson
2024-02-20 19:46   ` Richard Henderson
2024-02-20 21:20     ` Peter Maydell
2024-02-26 14:42       ` Peter Maydell
2024-02-21 15:34   ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2024-02-21 16:09     ` Peter Maydell
2024-02-21 17:06       ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2024-02-27  3:36   ` Zhao Liu
2024-02-20 16:06 ` [PATCH 07/10] hw/core/reset: Add qemu_{register, unregister}_resettable() Peter Maydell
2024-02-20 19:59   ` Richard Henderson
2024-02-27  6:02   ` Zhao Liu
2024-02-20 16:06 ` [PATCH 08/10] hw/core/reset: Implement qemu_register_reset via qemu_register_resettable Peter Maydell
2024-02-20 20:06   ` Richard Henderson
2024-02-27  6:18   ` Zhao Liu
2024-02-20 16:06 ` [PATCH 09/10] hw/core/machine: Use qemu_register_resettable for sysbus reset Peter Maydell
2024-02-20 19:06   ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2024-02-20 19:18     ` Peter Maydell
2024-02-20 20:09   ` Richard Henderson
2024-02-21 15:42   ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé [this message]
2024-02-27  6:27   ` Zhao Liu
2024-02-20 16:06 ` [PATCH 10/10] docs/devel/reset: Update to discuss system reset Peter Maydell
2024-02-20 20:13   ` Richard Henderson
2024-02-27  6:30   ` Zhao Liu
2024-02-20 21:38 ` [PATCH 00/10] reset: Make whole system three-phase-reset aware Michael S. Tsirkin
2024-02-21 11:59 ` Mark Cave-Ayland
2024-02-26 14:50 ` Peter Maydell

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=16ef6303-7527-4ab8-8a8c-62e6892963c1@linaro.org \
    --to=philmd@linaro.org \
    --cc=arei.gonglei@huawei.com \
    --cc=berrange@redhat.com \
    --cc=eduardo@habkost.net \
    --cc=marcel.apfelbaum@gmail.com \
    --cc=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=wangyanan55@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).