From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1FrmIt-0006Nl-1N for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 17 Jun 2006 21:42:19 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1FrmIr-0006NZ-9k for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 17 Jun 2006 21:42:18 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FrmIr-0006NW-5Q for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 17 Jun 2006 21:42:17 -0400 Received: from [64.233.182.187] (helo=nf-out-0910.google.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1FrmSp-0006bW-2l for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 17 Jun 2006 21:52:35 -0400 Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id k26so856908nfc for ; Sat, 17 Jun 2006 18:42:15 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <170581c20606171842h4bce1b48m7a6e8c2b097dd984@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sat, 17 Jun 2006 18:42:15 -0700 From: "Thomas Han" Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: Re: "invisible wall" patch In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_48496_19519020.1150594935380" References: <200606131046.40921.jseward@acm.org> <200606171203.38845.rickv@hobi.com> <200606171824.23986.jseward@acm.org> Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org ------=_Part_48496_19519020.1150594935380 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Hi All, for what its worth, I've also been using the latest from CVS (with the "invisible wall" patch) and it works great. Thanks! Thomas On 6/17/06, Alex wrote: > > I have not updated my sources this week. But in the past few months I had > to > manually apply the patch to make Qemu workable. And I use it a lot. Thanks > for a great product. > > -- > Alex. > > > "Julian Seward" wrote in message > news:200606171824.23986.jseward@acm.org... > > On Saturday 17 June 2006 18:03, Rick Vernam wrote: > >> On Saturday 17 June 2006 11:32, Alex wrote: > >> > This patch has been around for a while but never committed to the > >> > mainstream. > > > > Huh? Fabrice committed it some time around Tuesday. I've been > > using it 8+ hours/day since then and it seems fine to me. > > > > J > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Qemu-devel mailing list > Qemu-devel@nongnu.org > http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel > ------=_Part_48496_19519020.1150594935380 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Hi All,

for what its worth, I've also been using the latest from CVS (with the "invisible wall" patch) and it works great.

Thanks!
Thomas

On 6/17/06, Alex <void@aleksoft.net> wrote:
I have not updated my sources this week. But in the past few months I had to
manually apply the patch to make Qemu workable. And I use it a lot. Thanks
for a great product.

--
Alex.


"Julian Seward" <jseward@acm.org> wrote in message
news:200606171824.23986.jseward@acm.org...
> On Saturday 17 June 2006 18:03, Rick Vernam wrote:
>> On Saturday 17 June 2006 11:32, Alex wrote:
>> > This patch has been around for a while but never committed to the
>> > mainstream.
>
> Huh?  Fabrice committed it some time around Tuesday.  I've been
> using it 8+ hours/day since then and it seems fine to me.
>
> J





_______________________________________________
Qemu-devel mailing list
Qemu-devel@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel

------=_Part_48496_19519020.1150594935380--