Re: Requesting review about a bugfix in touch_all_pages

[Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>]

On 06/04/20 05:13, bauerchen(陈蒙蒙) wrote:
> 
> From faf903f7b8892179e64bd1a37fe3585a6441bc51 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Bauerchen <bauerchen@tencent.com>
> Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2020 10:36:54 +0800
> Subject: [PATCH] Fix: In touch_all_pages, maybe we need a lock to protect
>  qemu_cond_boardcast, or qemu_cond_boardcast may be called before all touch
>  page threads enter qemu_cond_wait. In this case,  main thread waits touch
>  page threads return, touch page threads wait main thread waking up, that is a
>  dead lock ,vm will be in pause state forever;
> 
> Signed-off-by: Bauerchen <bauerchen@tencent.com>
> ---
>  util/oslib-posix.c | 3 +++
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/util/oslib-posix.c b/util/oslib-posix.c
> index 4dd6d7d..062236a 100644
> --- a/util/oslib-posix.c
> +++ b/util/oslib-posix.c
> @@ -492,8 +492,11 @@ static bool touch_all_pages(char *area, size_t hpagesize, size_t numpages,
>                             QEMU_THREAD_JOINABLE);
>          addr += memset_thread[i].numpages * hpagesize;
>      }
> +
> +    qemu_mutex_lock(&page_mutex);
>      threads_created_flag = true;
>      qemu_cond_broadcast(&page_cond);
> +    qemu_mutex_unlock(&page_mutex);
>  
>      for (i = 0; i < memset_num_threads; i++) {
>          qemu_thread_join(&memset_thread[i].pgthread);
> -- 
> 1.8.3.1
> 

Queued, thanks.

Paolo