From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 741A9C433DB for ; Thu, 25 Feb 2021 16:34:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A9E3064F19 for ; Thu, 25 Feb 2021 16:34:30 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org A9E3064F19 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=crudebyte.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Received: from localhost ([::1]:51304 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lFJav-0005Ev-Mg for qemu-devel@archiver.kernel.org; Thu, 25 Feb 2021 11:34:29 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:36154) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lFJYF-0003tF-Of for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 25 Feb 2021 11:31:43 -0500 Received: from kylie.crudebyte.com ([5.189.157.229]:42027) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lFJY9-0002BF-O2 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 25 Feb 2021 11:31:43 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=crudebyte.com; s=kylie; h=Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding: MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:Date:Subject:To:From:Cc: Content-ID:Content-Description; bh=upbhcPvTDll9o9VVt1G+2DG4a+cndDZvHoepW8CGA4Q=; b=OQCUo3CrHLWPygn8vQnkbh8TfW dNT5hqzZLLVAkNqo9FwlIeGh4QUC31w4OK4zGBLg91wXLQcuskFB0XyfmD/W3SIZ7x5AeeXP10DFh njeUueMy5oCUH45APr3DoNB/LL0sOnnuUGwTWAQyfrQQCrOitAG0qoNZSF43nuYHqmtabnZ+H4Kr1 hvFqL9DO+gwf925jzyYq7A0nj0WVDM5QnTJhFEHswv+55ouG5AGw2HzKYs0/gFxJDJO4HDUPn8wJr RgYttOrFATbcCuQTQTcTdt+ieDaAii4pOFSlI+0ZG5q9zFDpwkcpEJcedI0jzW4wHZSRU8L9JmHy4 FKhaw+2N22PpLSE3wVtUwBBaegiFAxxig5JOagpRQZ1R4qRUwzu9UtSVccJiYemPyQ0bvOBSNXDDL fQHAsf+oHjcduRwSf3yAoi0Jd2AJgaACKjqBjOmtyiS0awl2qM0nkgB+lvlKrUYpU8KE388dj65bX i8Ueyhsy/XqYaovIOjzaYZCWVkg04wKD2d0+8WXLPTC19h5dTegfuS1PEd+ivgPPbdMIR4L9g3LrA xbUkA7qDWQRpioDcB6+6J7RBjd+3jcwYyl5tkb3MM6y+J2sT85LmW/g4BPb83Ca7aV+VljBUEyFbp 9EbmUmEHAgS0xlBr4PwTCgH1nA63XaIU1RdqhbEmQ=; From: Christian Schoenebeck To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Greg Kurz Subject: Re: 9pfs developers docs Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2021 17:31:22 +0100 Message-ID: <1713522.Q2EPVctnWf@silver> In-Reply-To: <18968671.BsRifgzQ0d@silver> References: <3475760.T70ipHyFzN@silver> <20210201132649.6db25cec@bahia.lan> <18968671.BsRifgzQ0d@silver> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Received-SPF: pass client-ip=5.189.157.229; envelope-from=qemu_oss@crudebyte.com; helo=kylie.crudebyte.com X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" On Montag, 1. Februar 2021 14:37:02 CET qemu_oss--- via wrote: > On Montag, 1. Februar 2021 13:26:49 CET Greg Kurz wrote: > > > > I agree that a bunch of other things should be documented, but that's > > > > definitely a great start. Thanks for doing this ! > > > > > > > > Just one remark on the topology diagram: > > > > > > > > https://wiki.qemu.org/File:9pfs_topology.png > > > > > > > > It gives the impression that the 9p transport and server can > > > > handle multiple guests, which they certainly don't : each > > > > 9p server lives in exactly one device which is exposed to > > > > exactly one guest. > > > > > > Right, I haven't considered that the diagram might be interpreted that > > > way. My primary intention was to show the 3 main components of 9pfs from > > > design perspective and secondary showing that multiple guests can share > > > storage. > > > > > > So what would be better: a) duplicating the server side in the diagram > > > (then the image might become a bit large in height), b) dropping the > > > multiple guests, c) making the issue with server instances clear in the > > > text? > > > > I'd rather go for b) > > Updated the diagram on the wiki page. > > To keep noise low, I won't send emails on further changes to that wiki page. > If you want to be auto notified then just add yourself to the watch list > there. Ok, I think I'm done with this page: https://wiki.qemu.org/Documentation/9p At least I think I've described everything I wanted to from my side regarding current 9p status. Best regards, Christian Schoenebeck