From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:52351)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <pbonzini@redhat.com>) id 1UK9qE-0003ea-Pf
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 25 Mar 2013 12:01:51 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <pbonzini@redhat.com>) id 1UK9q9-0006Al-La
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 25 Mar 2013 12:01:46 -0400
Received: from mx4-phx2.redhat.com ([209.132.183.25]:58583)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <pbonzini@redhat.com>) id 1UK9q9-0006AV-Bq
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 25 Mar 2013 12:01:41 -0400
Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2013 11:59:33 -0400 (EDT)
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <1728727938.13211675.1364227173610.JavaMail.root@redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <51506ACB.1090506@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC 10/12] Add qemu_put_buffer_no_copy
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: "Michael R. Hines" <mrhines@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Orit Wasserman <owasserm@redhat.com>, quintela@redhat.com, chegu vinod <chegu_vinod@hp.com>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, mst@redhat.com


> Right, the header's not used - but, are we certain that
> put_buffer_copy() will *always* be used for RAM in the future?

I think you should not make any assumption and proceed as if this
series didn't exist.

Paolo