From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:36747) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fRA6X-0004WK-Vs for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 08 Jun 2018 01:38:30 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fRA6V-0003Kk-7J for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 08 Jun 2018 01:38:29 -0400 Received: from mx3-rdu2.redhat.com ([66.187.233.73]:50810 helo=mx1.redhat.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fRA6V-0003KS-2P for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 08 Jun 2018 01:38:27 -0400 References: <20180607223111.27792-1-ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com> <20180607223111.27792-4-ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com> From: Thomas Huth Message-ID: <17f8856c-48d9-d112-cd7f-e1b3679d2f43@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 8 Jun 2018 07:38:17 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20180607223111.27792-4-ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [qemu PATCH 4/5] machine: fix some misspelled words List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Ross Zwisler , "Michael S. Tsirkin" Cc: Eduardo Habkost , linux-nvdimm , Qemu Developers , Stefan Hajnoczi , Igor Mammedov , Dan Williams On 08.06.2018 00:31, Ross Zwisler wrote: > Normally this might not be worth fixing, but several of these are strings > which are displayed to users. > > Signed-off-by: Ross Zwisler > --- > hw/core/machine.c | 6 +++--- > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/hw/core/machine.c b/hw/core/machine.c > index 617e5f8d75..a21269fa39 100644 > --- a/hw/core/machine.c > +++ b/hw/core/machine.c > @@ -609,7 +609,7 @@ static void machine_class_init(ObjectClass *oc, void *data) > machine_get_igd_gfx_passthru, machine_set_igd_gfx_passthru, > &error_abort); > object_class_property_set_description(oc, "igd-passthru", > - "Set on/off to enable/disable igd passthrou", &error_abort); > + "Set on/off to enable/disable igd passthru", &error_abort); Shouldn't that rather be "passthrough" instead? Thomas