From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:36712) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W2jDg-0005OG-2r for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 13 Jan 2014 10:14:34 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W2jDZ-0001pe-Fx for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 13 Jan 2014 10:14:28 -0500 Received: from mx5.pku.edu.cn ([162.105.129.59]:56340 helo=mail.pku.edu.cn) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W2jDY-0001pG-Qv for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 13 Jan 2014 10:14:21 -0500 Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2014 23:14:11 +0800 (CST) From: =?utf-8?B?566h6Zuq5rab?= Message-ID: <1803379872.20279.1389626051959.JavaMail.root@bj-mail03.pku.edu.cn> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: [Qemu-devel] =?utf-8?b?5Zue5aSN77yaIFJlOiAgW1BBVENIXSBsaW51eC11?= =?utf-8?q?ser=3A_sync_syscall_numbers_upto_3=2E13?= List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Peter Maydell Cc: Riku Voipio , Guan Xuetao , QEMU Developers , Patch Tracking The syscall numbers in unicore32 are correct because we have two ABIs for 3= 2 bits. In qemu, it's old ABI, while in kernel, it's new ABI. However, for now, old ABI is widely used for unicore32's applications. Thanks and Regards, Xuetao Guan ----- Peter Maydell =E5=86=99=E9=81=93=EF=BC=9A > On 13 January 2014 12:33, wrote: > > From: Riku Voipio > > > > All others updated except unicore, which doesn't look right to > > begin with. >=20 > Yes, I've noticed before that the Unicore syscall numbers are > just completely wrong. Guan, would you like to submit a patch > to fix them or should we just rip out the linux-user support > for unicore completely? There's no point carrying something > around that won't be able to do even basic syscalls... >=20 > thanks > -- PMM