From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:43592) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1f86JK-0007zQ-Sq for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 16 Apr 2018 11:44:55 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1f86JF-0006Rh-Uw for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 16 Apr 2018 11:44:54 -0400 References: <1523819244-29954-1-git-send-email-akrowiak@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <1523819244-29954-4-git-send-email-akrowiak@linux.vnet.ibm.com> From: David Hildenbrand Message-ID: <1808b8f3-9cff-c849-d012-b23f29d1c11f@redhat.com> Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2018 17:44:36 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1523819244-29954-4-git-send-email-akrowiak@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 3/5] s390x/cpumodel: Set up CPU model for AP device support List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Tony Krowiak , qemu-devel@nongnu.org Cc: qemu-s390x@nongnu.org, schwidefsky@de.ibm.com, heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com, borntraeger@de.ibm.com, cohuck@redhat.com, bjsdjshi@linux.vnet.ibm.com, pmorel@linux.vnet.ibm.com, alifm@linux.vnet.ibm.com, mjrosato@linux.vnet.ibm.com, jjherne@linux.vnet.ibm.com, pasic@linux.vnet.ibm.com, eskultet@redhat.com, berrange@redhat.com, alex.williamson@redhat.com, eric.auger@redhat.com, pbonzini@redhat.com, peter.maydell@linaro.org, agraf@suse.de, rth@twiddle.net > > diff --git a/target/s390x/gen-features.c b/target/s390x/gen-features.c > index 0cdbc15..0d5b0f7 100644 > --- a/target/s390x/gen-features.c > +++ b/target/s390x/gen-features.c > @@ -447,6 +447,9 @@ static uint16_t full_GEN12_GA1[] = { > S390_FEAT_ADAPTER_INT_SUPPRESSION, > S390_FEAT_EDAT_2, > S390_FEAT_SIDE_EFFECT_ACCESS_ESOP2, > + S390_FEAT_AP_QUERY_CONFIG_INFO, > + S390_FEAT_AP_FACILITIES_TEST, > + S390_FEAT_AP, > }; > Now I have to ask a very stupid question: I heard that the execution controls in the SIE block for AP are one of the oldest ones we have around. How can it be that the AP feature cannot be used before zEC12? -- Thanks, David / dhildenb