From: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
To: Jessica Clarke <jrtc27@jrtc27.com>, qemu-riscv@nongnu.org
Cc: Anup Patel <anup.patel@wdc.com>,
Alistair Francis <Alistair.Francis@wdc.com>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] goldfish_rtc: Fix non-atomic read behaviour of TIME_LOW/TIME_HIGH
Date: Sat, 18 Jul 2020 11:56:50 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <181ead03-ff89-9971-a527-1ff2038c35fd@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200718004934.83174-1-jrtc27@jrtc27.com>
On 7/17/20 5:49 PM, Jessica Clarke wrote:
> The specification says:
>
> 0x00 TIME_LOW R: Get current time, then return low-order 32-bits.
> 0x04 TIME_HIGH R: Return high 32-bits from previous TIME_LOW read.
>
> ...
>
> To read the value, the kernel must perform an IO_READ(TIME_LOW),
> which returns an unsigned 32-bit value, before an IO_READ(TIME_HIGH),
> which returns a signed 32-bit value, corresponding to the higher half
> of the full value.
>
> However, we were just returning the current time for both. If the guest
> is unlucky enough to read TIME_LOW and TIME_HIGH either side of an
> overflow of the lower half, it will see time be in the future, before
> jumping backwards on the next read, and Linux currently relies on the
> atomicity guaranteed by the spec so is affected by this. Fix this
> violation of the spec by caching the correct value for TIME_HIGH
> whenever TIME_LOW is read, and returning that value for any TIME_HIGH
> read.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jessica Clarke <jrtc27@jrtc27.com>
> ---
> Changes since v1:
>
> * Add time_high to goldfish_rtc_vmstate and increment version.
>
> hw/rtc/goldfish_rtc.c | 17 ++++++++++++++---
> include/hw/rtc/goldfish_rtc.h | 1 +
> 2 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
r~
prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-07-18 18:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-07-18 0:20 [PATCH] goldfish_rtc: Fix non-atomic read behaviour of TIME_LOW/TIME_HIGH Jessica Clarke
2020-07-18 0:43 ` Richard Henderson
2020-07-18 0:49 ` [PATCH v2] " Jessica Clarke
2020-07-18 7:42 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2020-07-18 14:43 ` Jessica Clarke
2020-07-18 18:08 ` Peter Maydell
2020-07-20 23:11 ` Alistair Francis
2020-07-18 18:56 ` Richard Henderson [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=181ead03-ff89-9971-a527-1ff2038c35fd@linaro.org \
--to=richard.henderson@linaro.org \
--cc=Alistair.Francis@wdc.com \
--cc=anup.patel@wdc.com \
--cc=jrtc27@jrtc27.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-riscv@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).