From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:43067) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XMk8J-0004og-1a for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 27 Aug 2014 16:48:01 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XMk8C-0003G6-SI for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 27 Aug 2014 16:47:54 -0400 Received: from mx6-phx2.redhat.com ([209.132.183.39]:59262) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XMk8C-0003Fv-KH for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 27 Aug 2014 16:47:48 -0400 Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2014 16:47:46 -0400 (EDT) From: Paolo Bonzini Message-ID: <1831930439.37152369.1409172466382.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <1058443416.220161.1409165212171.JavaMail.zimbra@xes-inc.com> References: <1009168463.49610.1408133034828.JavaMail.zimbra@xes-inc.com> <838926932.102908.1408490438455.JavaMail.zimbra@xes-inc.com> <280510069.69184.1408990389981.JavaMail.zimbra@xes-inc.com> <53FC3136.50900@redhat.com> <731385877.87249.1409149425950.JavaMail.zimbra@xes-inc.com> <53FDEC73.1020104@redhat.com> <1058443416.220161.1409165212171.JavaMail.zimbra@xes-inc.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Using cache=writeback safely on qemu 1.4.0 and later List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Andrew Martin Cc: Stefan Hajnoczi , qemu-devel > > Just the lack of fdatasyncs. > > I also did not see any fdatasyncs when using cache=none - would that also be > explained by this bug? Yes, cache=none and cache=writeback are the same as far as the _disk_ cache is concerned, and you need fdatasyncs to flush the disk cache too. Paolo