From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NsBt5-0005Cl-72 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 18 Mar 2010 05:19:31 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=38104 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NsBt4-0005CC-Ca for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 18 Mar 2010 05:19:30 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NsBt1-0001gs-R9 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 18 Mar 2010 05:19:30 -0400 Received: from mx4-phx2.redhat.com ([209.132.183.25]:48570 helo=mx02.colomx.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NsBt1-0001gk-GQ for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 18 Mar 2010 05:19:27 -0400 Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2010 05:19:25 -0400 (EDT) From: Paolo Bonzini Message-ID: <1850021959.400541268903965256.JavaMail.root@zmail07.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <1317337484.400521268903946714.JavaMail.root@zmail07.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com> Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH, RFC] Replace assert(0) with abort() or cpu_abort() MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Markus Armbruster Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org > The guest replacing one of QEMU's handlers with SIG_IGN or SIG_DFL would > be "fun", too. No idea whether that's actually possible; I know next to > nothing about user mode emulation. No, the guest program cannot replace QEMU's handlers; the host OS always sees host_signal_handler for all signals. But since host_signal_handler is used also for SIGABRT, after all this is not so obscure... Paolo